The present and future of Personal Learning Environments (PLE)
个人学习环境(PLE)的现在与未来
This post is recast from an assignment I completed about four months ago in a Masters Degree course entitled Innovative Practice and Emerging ICT, in which I investigated what PLEs are meant to be and where they might be going. It was originally part of a class wiki.
这篇文章是我从四个月前完成的一份硕士研究生课程作业重写而来,原来题目是《信息与通信技术的创新实践与发展》在文章中我调查PLE的意义和趋势。它是课程维基的原始部分。
Contents
目录
- Introduction
- 导言
- Towards a Definition
- 定义
- Driving Forces
- 动力
- Developments to Date
- 发展
- Barriers
- 障碍
- Future Potential
- 潜力
- References
- 参考
- Web Links
- 链接
Introduction
导言
A definition for the term Personal Learning Environment (PLE), remains elusive. Conception about what should constitute a PLE depends on the perspective of the commentator. For example, the priorities for a PLE are different for a tertiary student, a university administrator, an instructor, a working professional, or an adult who persues an eclectic path of lifelong learning. Metaphorically, an individual may engage in a learning process that is either more acquisitional or participatory (Sfard, 1998). There are inconsistencies across these positions about what a PLE should do. But whether constructively and defensively, interest in PLE appears to be growing.
关于个人学习环境(PLE)的定义,至今仍未明确。关于由什么构成PLE的概念,完全取决于定义者的视角。比如,PLE的优先级就和大专生、大学行政人员、教师、专家或者一个追求终生学习的折衷道路的成年人,就完全不同。隐喻,个体在参与到学习过程当中,不是有所收获就是得到参与(Sfard,1998)。关于PLE应该发挥什么作用,各家看法不一致。但对于PLE的建设性和防守性的兴趣都在增长。
At the time of writing this introduction (August 2006), no particular product or service exists that can definitively be categorised as a PLE, although some prototypical work is in progress. An inclusive, authoritative account about PLEs does not yet exist. Only a handful of articles have appeared in the academic and public press about PLEs since the term gained currency in 2004. This article has been compiled after tracking recent conversations in the blogosphere and following social bookmarks.
在写这份导言的时候(2006年8月),还没有可以明确称为PLE的产品存在,虽然有些原型工作正在进展当中。一个关于PLE的具有包容性、权威性的报告尚不存在。自从2004年开始出现PLE这个词汇以来,只有学术界和新闻出版界有极少数文章提及。本文是在参考blogosphere中的对话及相关社会书签后完成的。
Towards a Definition
定义
The following definition is intended to introduce the general nature of PLEs:
以下定义试图介绍PLE的一般性质:
a Personal Learning Environment is a facility for an individual to access, aggregate, configure and manipulate digital artefacts of their ongoing learning experiences.
个人学习环境是一个工具集,可以令个体在其进行学习体验过程中访问、聚集、配置和操控数字化产品。
This definition captures the following salient aspects, which seem to be common across all current viewpoints:
该定义抓住了以下几个突出方面,他们在当前所有观点中均有涉及:
- PLEs are effectively controlled by the individual, thus decoupled from institutional portals like university Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) or workplace Learning Management Systems (LMS) for which the design goals are in response to institutional requirements.
- PLE通过个体进行有效控制,因此从依照体制要求而设计的大学虚拟学习环境(VLE)或者工作场所的学习管理系统(LMS)等传统门户中脱离出来。
- The artefacts operated upon through PLEs include the digital resources and references with which individuals wish to engage presently and perhaps recall in the future. Resources include not only static text and media but also dynamic services and their artefacts, such as instant messaging, online forum and weblog conversations. Whereas an ePortfolio contains actual assets for the purpose of reflection, assessment or self-promotion, the PLE includes a broader repository that also includes links and commentary for all three purposes.
- 这些通过PLE处理的数字化产品,包括个体希望当前使用的、打算将来在使用的数字化资源和引文。资源不仅仅包括静态文本和媒体,也包括动态服务及其相关产品,比如,实时聊天、在线论坛以及博客留言讨论。电子档案袋具有便于反思、评估或自我促进的具体优点,但PLE具有更广泛的环境,可以包含前面三个目的的连接和评论。
- The primary goal of a PLE for an individual is to bring all the disparate artefacts of interest for learning under a single operating roof. The presumption is that there are many artefacts, organising them is time-consuming and it's easy to forget about or lose them. PLEs are meant to simplify managing these artefacts, creating meaning through aggregation, linking and metadata tagging (eg comments, keywords).
- 对于个人,PLE的首要目的是就是将因为学习而感兴趣的所有不相干的东西聚拢到同一个操作平台中去。可以肯定,有很多种东西,要将其组织起来很费时间,也很容易遗忘或丢失。PLE意味着简化对这些东西的管理,通过聚合、链接和元数据标签(比如注释、关键词)为其创建意义。
- A PLE integrates with the digital services to which the individual currently subscribes. These could be the university VLE, the workplace LMS or a collection of so-called Web 2.0 services like social bookmarking or photo sharing.
- PLE使这种数字化服务与个人当前订阅的其他服务成为一体。可能是大学VLE,工作场所的LMS,或者一些所谓的web2.0服务,比如社会化书签或者照片共享服务。
- A PLE spans the various learning experiences to which an individual subscribes throughout life. High school students may begin to operate their own PLE, hooking it into their school's VLE. Upon university entrance, it could be connected to the university VLE. If entering professional practice, the individual could then link the PLE to workplace learning and professional development facilities. All the while, the individual may wish to link selectively to an evolving parade of Web 2.0 services which are found to be useful for enabling personal growth and learning.
- PLE覆盖个人赞同的多种学习体验,伴随终身。高中生可以开始经营他们自己的PLE,挂接到他们学校的VLE上。进入大学以后,也可以连接到大学的VLE。进入专业实践以后,个体可以将其PLE与工作场所的学习与专业发展平台相挂钩。在进行这些的同时,个体可能希望有选择性的链接到一个不断演化的web2.0服务序列当中去,而这些服务被认为是对个人的成长和学习是有益的。

This diagram shows how PLEs are situated at the intersection of VLEs, Web 2.0 and an expanded view of ePortfolios.
该图像显示了PLE是如何位于VLE、web2.0和扩展的电子档案袋的交集的。
Driving Forces
动力
How a PLE might ultimately be deployed is bracketed by the forces driving its evolution and the barriers to acceptance.
PLE最终将如何部署,取决于它自身演化的动力以及认可的障碍。
The structure, features and policies of most VLE implementations tend to perpetuate the traditional instructivist models of education. The primary purpose of the systems is to organise course content for transmission to enrolled students. Only some VLEs provide shared file areas and collaborative facilities like chat and discussion forums. In universities, VLEs often act as secure gateways to digital indexes and research journals. Unless students manually copy materials out of the VLE walled garden, all traces of their learning experience through the VLE are lost once they complete their studies.
绝大多数VLE实施过程中的结构、特征以及政策倾向于延续传统的教育教学模式。系统的主要目的是为选课的学生传输课程内容而组织课程内容。只有某些VLE提供文件共享区域和协作措施,比如聊天室和论坛。在大学里,VLE常常被当作通向数字化索引和研究期刊的安全接口。学生只能手工复制VLE围墙花园以外的资料,一旦他们完成学习,通过VLE对他们学习体验的所有记录都将丢失。
The notion of a PLE arose in response to the technical and policy constraints imposed by institutionalised VLEs and LMSs in both educational and workplace settings, which are perceived to impede personal learning choices. University administrators view access to external web services as a risk to the institution rather than an affordance for learners and faculty. Hence, they prefer the more limited view of PLEs as a configurable extension to a VLE, especially when they continue to see themselves as the monopoly technology service providers for their learning community (eg online enrolment, email addresses).
PLE的观念出现在教育场所和工作环境里的制度化VLE和LMS的技术和政策方面的强制约束的响应,这种约束被认为是对个人学习选择的阻碍。大学行政人员将访问外部网络服务视作对制度的危害,而非学生和教员的???。因此,他们宁愿将PLE看作VLE的一个有诸多限制的可配置扩展,特别是在他们继续把自己看作他们的学习社区(比如在线入学、邮件地址)的垄断性技术服务提供商的时候。
In North America the commercial vendors of VLEs dominate. There are unconfirmed media reports that the VLEs supplied by Blackboard Inc. serve over two thirds of all universities in Australia and New Zealand. On the other hand, in Europe more sites use inhouse and open source implementations (Vuorikari, 2003).
在北美,商业VLE公司占主导。有未经证实的媒体报道,blackboard公司提供的VLE占到了澳大利亚和新西兰大学的三分之二。另一方面,欧洲更多网站使用内部的和开源的解决方案(Vuorikari,2003)
In January 2006, Blackboard Inc., the leading commercial vendor of academic VLEs, was granted US patent 6,988,138 on "Internet-based education support system and methods", even though there is evidently a long history of virtual learning environments. It does not appear that the patent, if enforced, has any direct bearing on the emergence of PLEs, although the patent action may foster a backlash against VLEs.
在2006年元月,Blackboard公司,学术VLE的领导性商业提供者,共获得“基于互联网的教育支持系统和方法”方面的美国专利698,8138件,即使这很明显涉及到虚拟学习环境的历史。这并不看得出,这些专利,如果强制的话,能够对PLE的出现起到任何直接影响,虽然这些专利行动可能会引起反VLE势力的高涨。
Interestingly, some faculties have implemented and manage their own VLEs which are more dynamic, more concerned with learning experiences and are publicly-licensed products (eg .LRN, Moodle, Plone, Drupal, Sakai). These allow custom extensions, which may pave the way for the development of open APIs for connection by PLEs.
有意思的是,某些院系已经实施和部署了他们自己的更加灵活、更加关注学习体验的VLE,并且都是公开授权产品(比如 .LRN, Moodle, Plone, Drupal, Sakai )。这些产品允许定制扩展,这为开发连接到PLE的开放API铺平了道路。
Enlightened educational practice has increasingly embraced student-centred learning. This includes the assignment of tasks with an open, constructivist foundation, where students push learning forward through active collaboration, problem-solving, investigation and discovery, creating meaning on their own terms. Where the Web serves as an avenue of inquiry, it seems natural that part of the student-centredness should be in the choice and configuration of tools for action. This is the space for a PLE.
开明的教育实践逐渐拥抱以学生为中心的学习。这包括以建构主义为理论基础的开放式任务的功课,让学生通过积极协作、解决问题、调查与发现、用他们自己的话语创建知识,从而在学习中进步。在这里,网页服务成为调查的渠道,是以学生为中心的必不可少的一部分,应该存在于为行动而选择和配置的工具之中。这就是一个PLE的空间。
So far, discussion about PLEs has emanated primarily from academic circles, who recognise that there are learning opportunities with some Web 2.0 services.
到目前为止,有关PLE的讨论主要来自学术界,他们认识到,某些web2.0服务能够为他们的学习带来机会。
The use of ePortfolio (electronic portfolio) software and services is well established in many higher education jurisdictions, with administrators having set policies for their use (primarily for assessment). If PLEs are viewed simply as an extension of ePortfolios, then acceptance of them may be more assured.
电子档案袋软件和服务,已经很好的使用在许多高等教育管理机构当中,行政人员为他们的使用(主要是用于评估)制定政策。如果PLE仅仅被看作是电子档案袋的一个扩展,那么他们接受起来会更放心。
Adults who engage in relatively unstructured inquiry or informal learning, for reasons of professional or skills development or general interest, could benefit from tools and techniques to organise their endeavours. At this stage, there is little anecdotal evidence of interest in this area. However, the possibilities may simply not be widely known yet.
处于专业或技能开发或者一般兴趣,成年人从事相对松散的查询或非正式学习,可以通过努力从工具和技术中获得利益。在这个阶段这个领域的兴趣,有一个小小的八卦证据。然而,这种可能性很简单的还未广为人知。
For each online service, an individual's identity must be provided for each session. On one's regular personal computer, identity retention alleviates the problem by availing cookies and field prefills, including passwords. But this advantage is lost when using multiple computers. So organising one's personal learning through a variety of web-based services involves managing multiple login names and passwords. A PLE could alleviate the daily problem of login identification by storing and safeguarding the data for automatic application. This problem could also be eased by developments in Identity 2.0, an evolving standards-based scheme in which an individual's single, unique, verifiable web identity claim could be applied to securely grant access to multiple web services.
对于每一个在线服务的每一次任务,个人都必须提供身份。如果某人经常使用某台计算机,利用cookies和外部预先填充功能保存身份和密码缓解了这个问题。但是,当使用多台计算机的时候这种优势便丧失了。所以,通过多个基于网页的服务组织某人的个人学习,会导致管理多个登录名和密码的问题。PLE可以通过存储和维护自动应用程序的数据,从而缓解登录确认的问题。这个问题也可以通过正在发展中的Identity2.0进行缓解,一个不断发展的,基于标准的方案——个人的单人的、唯一的、可验证的网上身份声明,可以用于安全的访问多个网页服务。
Software development companies are keen to make their product or service a nexus of attention. Whilst some learners may persist with the DIY approach to organising the scattered pieces of their learning environment, companies would rather see a PLE promoted as a particular product or service which solve the problem of that messiness. This applies not just to software for personal computers, but also for mobile PDAs.
软件开发公司乐于他们自己的产品或者服务受到关注。当某些学习者坚持采用自己动手的方式组织管理他们学习环境的各个零散部分的时候,商业公司更愿意看到PLE作为一个特定产品或服务,来解决这种混乱局面。不仅仅是用于个人计算机的软件,也可以用于移动PDA。
Developments to Date
发展
A WebTop is a new class of web-served applications enabling single-screen one-click preconfigured access to other web services which can be nominated by the user, for example photo sharing (eg FlickR), online calendar, weblogs, integrated feed aggregator, online word processor (eg Google Writely), shared spreadsheet (eg Google Spreadsheet), shared whiteboard (eg GE Imagination Cubed), social bookmarking (eg del.icio.us, Furl) and consolidated productivity services (eg Zoho). So far they are primarily aimed at business users, but many of their features match what is prescribed for a PLE. Examples include YouOS, 30Boxes and NetVibes.
网络桌面是一类新型的网页服务应用,在同一屏幕内,点击一次预先设置好的配置,就可以进入用户指定的其他网页服务,如照片共享(如Flickr)、在线日历、网络日志、整合型订阅源阅读软件、在线文字处理软件(如Google Docs)、共享电子表格(如Google Spreadsheet)、共享白板(如GE Imagination Cubed)、社会化书签(比如del.icio.us、Furl)以及综合办公服务(如Zoho)。到目前为止这些都主要是针对企业用户,但是其中许多特征与PLE要求相符。网络桌面的实例包括YouOs、30Boxes和NetVibes。
A Mashup is like a WebTop, but the web services are combined much more tightly so that data from one is used to access information in another. A simple example is the integration of weblog with an embedded online calendar. In a more advanced, customised example, data from a particular Google Spreadsheet could be fed into Google Earth. A PLE could be implemented as a mashup.
混搭,类似于网络桌面,但是这种网络服务结合得更紧密,使得一个服务的数据可以是另一个服务访问的信息。将网络日志和嵌入式在线日历聚合在一起就是一个简单例子。在另一个更高级、用户定制程度更高的例子当中,一个特定Google电子表格的数据可以注入到Google Earth。PLE可以以混搭的形式实现。
The open source Mozilla FireFox browser has been extended by Flock to create a WebTop which integrates your browser with your weblog and other web services.
Flock将开源的Mozilla FireFox 浏览器扩展成一个网络桌面,将你的网络日志和其它网络服务整合进你的浏览器当中。
Some edubloggers have expressed the view that PLEs exist already in an ad hoc manner. Through their weblogs, they reflect on their own work and experiences and link to others. Through mashing into their weblog templates, they can directly open their own social bookmarks, images and other web services to which they subscribe. They use publicly-accessible server space to store and share files.
一些教育博客表达了这样一个看法,即PLE已经以一种特定的方式存在着。他们通过网络日志,反思自己的工作和体验,并链接到其他人。通过嵌入到他们日志模板的应用,他们可以直接打开他们自己的社会书签、图像和他们订阅的其他网页服务。他们使用可以公开访问的网络空间存储并分享这些文件。
If an individual has enough server space available, with the right software facilities in place, plone or Drupal could be installed and employed as a PLE. These are content management systems (CMS) which handle many types of content including a wiki. Third-party modules may be added (eg KNotes weblog). This wiki entry about Personal Learning Environments is presented by a customised implementation of plone.
如果个人有足够可用的服务器空间,在适当的地方使用正确的软件工具的话,那么plone或者Drupal可以作为PLE而安装部署。这些都是内容管理系统(CMS),可以处理许多类型的内容,包括维基。可以增加第三方模块(比如KNotes 网络日志)。有关个人学习环境的维基条目由plone用户提供。
From late 2005 at Bolton University in the UK, A JISC-funded and CETIS-sponsored team are designing a reference model for a PLE. Through the project they will define the scope, review the theory, come up with scenarios (use cases), look for and document patterns, and define some specifications. All the while, the programming part of the team build some prototype software to see if it all makes sense. This prototype is called PLEX. Their project wiki offers the most comprehensive consideration about PLEs currently available. (Milligan, 2005)
自2005年底起,在英国博尔顿大学,一个由英国联系信息系统委员会(JISC)资助、教育技术互用性标准中心(CETIS)赞助的团队正在设计一个PLE的参考模型。通过这个项目,他们定义了范围、审查了理论,提出了方案(使用情况),建立了文档模型,并确定了一些规格。自始至终,该团队的程序组建立了一些原型软件,检查这些是否合理。该原型被称作PLEX。其项目维基对于当前可用的PLE提供了最全面的思考。(Milligan,2005)
The concept of an ePortfolio emerged from the paper-based folio used by design students for over half a century. By the mid-1990s, students began uploading examples of their work and linking them statically to their home pages, creating webfolios. Database-driven server-side applications (and the tools to build them) matured by the end of the millennium. By 2002, there was feverish activity to create ePortfolios as personalised learning content management systems. (Batson, 2002) Whether developed in-house or by software vendors, many higher education institutions began to implement them. Most ePortfolios are intended for document management, retrieval and presentation. (EduTools, 2006). Products offer various features for organisation, annotation, document linking, reflection, collaboration, formatting, goal setting, reporting, import/export and communication. Some are components of VLEs (eg Blackboard ePortfolio). Importantly, almost all ePortfolio products are licensed by institutions rather than individuals. Therefore, they are neither portable nor interoperable.
电子档案袋概念的出现,来自于使用了超过半个世纪的、为学生设计的、基于纸张的对开文件夹。1990年代中期开始,学生们开始上传他们功课范例并静态链接到他们的主页上,由此创造了网上文件夹。到了千禧年底,数据库驱动的服务器端应用程序(以及创建它们的响应工具)成熟。2002年开始,有尝鲜者创建电子档案袋作为个人学习内容管理系统(Batson,2002)。不管是由企业内部还是有软件开发商开发,许多高等教育机构开始部署电子档案袋。多数电子档案袋都是起到文档管理检索与展示的功能(EduTools,2006)。产品为组织、注解、文档的链接、反思、组合、格式化、全局设置、报告、导入/导出以及交流提供了各种功能。其中某些是VLE(如Blackboard 电子档案袋)的组件。重要的是,几乎所有电子档案袋产品都是由专业机构开发,而非个人。因此,他们既不是便携式,也不可彼此协作。
Barriers
障碍
In the absence of a new product or service, only those who are tech-savvey with a willingness to tinker will consider integrating their learning world through a wiki or a weblog. Whilst this is much easier than it used to be, thanks to templated software, it is unlikely that a large percentage of people will take this up.
在缺乏新产品或服务的时候,只有那些勇于尝试的、具有技术头脑的人,才会考虑利用维基或者网络日志将其学习世界整合起来。由于有模板化软件,现在这比以前要容易,但仍然不大可能有很高比例的人这样做。
For PLE software and services to be useful for students who must deal with a VLE, VLEs must provide the capability to interoperate. This requires that VLEs make secure software gateways (eg. APIs) available. It is unlikely that commercial VLEs are willing to distribute their control of the learning environment and provide flexibility, preferring instead to keep users within their proprietary range. In March 2006, Blackboard Inc. announced plans (Blackboard Beyond Initiative) to create network to connect users and alumni of their worldwide implementations, including proprietary social networking, personalisation, file sharing and ePortfolio presentation. It is in their commercial interest to cast their proprietary net as far and wide as possible.
要想PLE软件或者服务对学生有用,他就必须使用能够提供互操作功能的VLE。这就要求VLE提供安全的软件接口(如API)。商业VLE不大可能放开对学习环境的控制,变得更加灵活,他们更愿意将用户限制在他们的专利权范围内。在2006年3月,Blackboard公司宣布(Blackboard超越倡议书)计划在世界范围内创建连接用户和校友的网络,包括专有的社会网络、个性化、文件共享和电子档案袋介绍。到目前为止他们的商业兴趣在于尽可能广泛的投入到他们的专有网络当中。
On the other hand, such gateways for open source VLEs could appear and be implemented subject to institutional approval. But standardisation (aside from RSS feeds from within the VLE environment) is improbable, with each VLE having its own processing and storage idiosyncrasies. So the market will rely on developers providing separate plug-ins for each VLE, to mash into the learner's PLE. The prospect of a lot of moving parts seems unassailable.
另一方面,这些用于开源VLE的接口的出现和实施容易得到机构批准。但是很难做到标准化(不仅仅是来自VLE环境内部的RSS订阅源),因为每一套VLE都由他自己特色的处理过程和存储方式。因此市场需要依赖于开发者为每一套VLE提供专门的插件,从而混搭进学习者的PLE。想要有大量通用组件的愿望基本上是不可能实现的。
The issue of intellectual property and the management of digital rights looms large. Copies of research papers from subscribed journals may be located in a walled VLE for access by a particular cohort. But does subsequently peeling them into or referencing them from a PLE stretch the licence too far? These issues need to be addressed.
知识产权和数码版权管理问题很严重。在有访问限制的VLE内部,期刊中研究论文的副本只有特定人群才可以访问。但是接下来PLE对资料进行的剥离或参考使得这种授权能延伸多远?这些问题需要加以解决。
People fear putting all their eggs in one basket. Users must be able to export their PLE repository in some generic format for safekeeping, especially if the PLE is a web service.
人们害怕风险集中。出于安全起见,用户必须可以以某种常规格式导出他们的PLE数据,特别是如果该PLE是一个网页服务。
PLEs may be seen as an extension of ePortfolios, but the latter are rarely used beyond school. The perception of ePortfolios as merely a presentation layer for stored digital assets must be stretched if PLEs are to be seen as their natural successor.
PLE可以被看作是电子档案袋的扩展,但是后者很少在学校以外的场合使用。电子档案袋仅仅是可存储的数字化资产的一个表象,如果PLE被看作他们的自然继承者,那么这种观念必须被扩展。
Future Potential
潜力
Because developments about PLEs are at such an embryonic stage, it would not be prudent to predict with too much conviction what will happen. Many published forecasts of technology adoption draw a line from current work as if the technology is determined to succeed (eg EDUCAUSE & New Media Consortium, 2006). But the barriers are significant, not least due to the lack of a clear vision of what a PLE should do.
因为PLE的开发还处于萌芽阶段,还不能准确的预测将会发生什么。许多已发表的技术性预测采用与当前工作划清界限的办法,好像这样一来技术就一定会成功一样(比如EDUCAUSE与新媒体联盟,2006)。虽然道路是艰辛的,但至少不会缺少PLE应该做什么的清晰目标。
The success of PLEs (those which are independent of commercial VLEs) will depend on:
PLE的成功(都是独立的商业VLE)取决于:
- the ease with which they can be implemented and used by learners
- 易于部署、易于学习者的使用
- interoperability
- 互操作性好
- the confidence that learners and institutional administrators have with them.
- 学习者和行政人员对他们的信心。
While some prescribe a vision for learning which promotes pedagogies consistent with social constructivism (Dalsgaard 2006), getting there is quite another matter. As with any paradigm shift, the biggest barrier to technological revolution lies in the political and commercial inertia of the status quo. Many commentators believe it can only occur through grass-roots effort which will bootstrap a new market. (This is what occurred with ePortfolios.)
虽然有一些PLE为学习指明了方向,促使教学法与社会建构主义相一致(Dalsgaard 2006),但要真正做到又是另外一回事。与任何变化一样,技术革命的最大障碍来自于当下的政策和商业习惯。许多评论者相信,要形成一个全新的市场,只能通过草根阶层的努力(这也是电子档案袋身上发生的事情)。
In the next year we should see a consolidation of views about what constitutes a PLE. There are benefits to both web-served (ie. like webtops) and desktop solutions, so surely hybrids will appear.
在未来的一年里,我们应该看到,关于有哪些部分构成的PLE的看法将得到统一。网络服务(比如网络桌面等)和桌面解决方案都能获益,因此两者的混合体也一定会出现。
It is probable that within the next year pilot PLE projects will appear which will mash configurable access to Web 2.0 services into online ePortfolio-type environments. The next hurdle will be for higher education teachers to recommend that students obtain individual licences for these first-generation PLEs in conjuction with or as replacements to institutional ePortfolios. This shift will not be tivial, as there will be resistance to institutional policy change regarding the use of ePortfolios. Publicly-funded PLE projects will be more readily accepted.
很有可能在接下来的一年里,导航型PLE项目即将出现,它可以将可配置访问的web2.0服务混搭进在线电子档案袋类型的环境中。下一个障碍将是给高校教师推荐,学生从第一代PLE获得个人授权,从而结合或替换传统的电子档案袋。这种转变很关键,因为这将对电子档案袋的使用相关传统政策形成阻力。政府资助的PLE项目将更容易被接受。
This should kick-start efforts to create gateway APIs and plug-ins into open source VLEs, which can then be mashed in too. This development will be difficult and take considerable time. The success of this integration will be a determining factor in the viability of PLEs as a widely-used product. It will probably take at least three years for a PLE platform to become stable and a critical mass to have the confidence to take advantage of the technology.
应该努力为开源VLE创建接口API和插件,这些都可以混搭进PLE中。这些开发可能会很困难,很耗时间。整合成功与否将成为该PLE是否广泛使用的一个很重要因素。这将花费这些PLE平台至少三年时间,使其更稳定,让人开始有信心去利用这些技术。
References
参考
Batson, T. (2002). The Electronic Portfolio Boom: What's it All About?," Campus Technology. Accessed 31 Aug 2006 from http://www.campustechnology.com/article.asp?id=6984
Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 12 July 2006. Accessed 31 Aug 2006 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm.
EDUCAUSE & New Media Consortium (2006). 2006 Horizon Report. Accessed 25 July 2006 from http://www.educause.edu/LibraryDetailPage/666?ID=CSD4387
EduTools. (2006). ePortfolio: EduTools ePortfolio Review. Accessed 31 Aug 2006 from http://www.edutools.info/static.jsp?pj=16&page=HOME
Milligan, C. (2005) Colin Milligan Weblog, elgg.net. Accessed 31 Aug 2006 from http://elgg.net/cdmilligan/weblog/3720.html
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
van Harmelen, M. (2006). Personal Learning Environments. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06), IEEE.
Vuorikari, R. (2003). Virtual Learning Environments for European Schools, a Survey and Commentary", European SchoolNet, EUN Consortium, Brussels.
Vuorikari, R. (2005). Can personal digital knowledge artefacts' management and social networks enhance learning? European SchoolNet, EUN Consortium, Brussels. Accessed 31 Aug 2006 from http://elgg.net/riina/files/-1/1444/social_networks_learning_vuorikari_22_9_2005.pdf.
Web Links
链接
All web links are current at 31 Aug 2006 (see document source to view all URIs)
所有链接均为2006年8月31日链接(阅读文档源代码可查看所有链接)
To follow current conversations about PLEs, start with the following del.icio.us tags:
本文中有关PLE的资料,在美味书签中的标签:
PLE (user rlubensky): http://del.icio.us/rlubensky/PLE
PLE_Workshop_2006: http://del.icio.us/tag/PLE_Workshop_2006
Also these tags about PLEs from Technorati:
以及Technorati中与PLE有关的标签
http://members.optusnet.com.au/rlubensky/2006/12/present-and-future-of-personal-learning.htmlhttp://www.technorati.com/tag/Personal%20Learning%20Environments
January 23rd, 2008 at 10:47 am
Google Scholar came in REALLY handy for academic research as well - it tended to be more useful than my uni’s online academic journal search as I could look through a whole bunch of databases at once. If Google had a citation but not an actual article, I could look it up on the uni library site.
Google Scholar 的到来真的方便了学术研究——它使得能更方便的搜索大学在线学术期刊,相当于一次搜索了若干数据库。如果Google只给出引文而没有给出整篇文章,我也可以在学校图书馆找到它。
Almost all your college blogs are for US students. Any suggestions for those from other countries?
你的大学日志基本上面向美国大学生。有无给其他国家大学生的建议?
For those looking for experiential and non-traditional educational resources, allow me to plug my blog EducateDeviate:
要找更多经验和非传统教育资源,可以到我的日志:
http://educatedeviate.wordpress.com
January 23rd, 2008 at 11:29 am
Tiara: Good point on Google Scholar. I rarely use it, but when you need it, it’s nice to know it’s there!
关于Google Scholar说得很到点子上。我很少用它,但是当你需要他的时候,你会很高兴他还在那儿。
There are a couple of UK bloggers in the list, but you’re right — most of them are US-based. The information is probably applicable anywhere, but a different perspective might be nice, and different systems *do* present different challenges. I’m sure there are non-US-based student productivity blogs out there, but a) some are in languages other than English, which I wouldn’t understand, and b) I guess I haven’t come across them yet. Know any good ones?
列表中有两个英国博客,你是对的——大部分都是美国的。这些信息可能适用于所有地方,但是从不同的角度去看可能不错,不同的系统会导致不同的挑战。我知道别的地方也有非美国的学生生产力日志,但是(一)有些用的不是英语,我看不懂;(二)我才我还没有看到他们。你知道哪些不错的?
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Nice list!
不好的列表!
Just a few a wanted to share:
我也拿出一些来分享:
GIMP alternative: Paint.net
GIMP的替代物:Paint.net
http://www.getpaint.net/
TO-DO list alternative: todoist
待做事项列表替代物:todolist
http://todoist.com/
January 23rd, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Paint.NET is a good free alternative to PhotoShop and GIMP that’s much easier to use. Windows only.
Paint.net是一个很好的Photoshop和GIMP免费替代物,也更容易使用。仅用于Windows平台。
January 23rd, 2008 at 3:45 pm
OpenOffice, GIMP and Mozy I definitely agree with, use them even now. May I also suggest my student guides
我完全赞同对OpenOffice、GIMP和Mozy的评价,我现在就在使用。允许我推荐我的 student guides 。
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:50 pm
here is another collborative web-based mind mapping tool worth looking at http://www.comapping.com .
这里还有一个基于网页的协作式心智图工具,值得一看。 http://www.comapping.com 。【译者注:要收费】
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:53 pm
There’s a new online resource for students that you may be interested in.
这让有一份新的在线学生资源,你可能会感兴趣。
It’s called UniSurvival and is aimed at giving advice, study tips, and general coping strategies to university students. Based in the UK, but written by a collection of lecturers and student advisors from around the world, the site is aimed at tertiary students of all kinds, wherever they are.
它叫做 UniSurvival ,目标是给大学生提供建议、学习提示以及一般的复制策略。总部设在英国,但写作的讲师和学生顾问来自世界各地。网站的目标是所有的大专学生,无论他们身处何处。
Although it’s in its formative stages, has just received a major injection of resources and is at the beginning of a major growth period. Look for a site redesign and a large upswing in post regularity from the new contributors over the next week or two.
虽然还处在初始阶段,刚刚得到主要的资源注入,处在关键的成长时期的初期。接下来一两周,寻求网站重新设计,以及来自新贡献者的帖子稳步快速增长。
January 23rd, 2008 at 6:09 pm
You may also want to add wikiHow. I’m a volunteer editor there, but they have a bunch of really great college-related how-to articles about topics such as cramming for exams, how to use certain types of software, drinking and how to balance school and life as an adult.
你可能还要加上wikiHow。我是那里的一名志愿编辑,那里有大量非常优秀的大学相关入门文章,相关主题包括考前强记,如何使用某种类型的软件,饮酒以及成年人如何平衡学校和生活之间的关系。
January 23rd, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Really solid advice all around. I’d like to add a few.
全篇的建议都很中肯。我补充两点。
(1) del.icio.us -> Great for bookmarking interesting articles and useful links on your university’s webpage. Tag lots to make finding things easier later.
(1)del.icio.us -> 非常适合收藏感兴趣的文章,对链接到你大学首页也很有用。多多设置标签可以让以后找的更容易一些。
(2) Invest in a flash drive and load up on portable apps. I carried OpenOffice.org, Firefox, and Pidgin on mine.
(2)买一个优盘,运行便携式软件。我自己的装得有OpenOffice.org、Firefox、Pidgin。
(3) Calendar. Having a good calendar (as well as a to do list) is a big booster in staying organized and keeping on top of assignments. I recommend Google Calendar and Mozilla Sunbird.
(3)日历。拥有一份好的日历(以及待办事项列表)对组织工作是一大助力,并能在功课中保持领先。我推荐Google Calendar 和Mozilla Sunbird。
January 26th, 2008 at 7:22 am
Bookmarked! Already use many of these but I’m eager to implement the new ones on this list. Additions not already mentioned:
收藏!里面有许多已经在使用了,我迫切的想尝试列表中的新东西。增补一些没有提到的:
http://definr.com
http://www.schoolr.com