2009年10月26日星期一

翻译《12 学习空间》

Learning Spaces


学习空间



Malcolm Brown


马尔科姆·布朗

Dartmouth College


达特茅斯学院




© Malcolm Brown


版权(c)马尔科姆·布朗




New ideas about learning spaces represent a significant opportunity for higher education to make learners—and learning—more successful. Through the application of information technology, today's learning spaces have the potential to serve the new learning paradigm and at the same time meet the needs and expectations of the most recent generation of students: the Net Generation. Since education is the core mission of higher education, learning and the space in which it takes place are of the utmost importance. In order to best serve the educational enterprise, we must design leaning spaces that optimize the convergence of the Net Generation, current learning theory, and information technology.


有关学习空间的新思路,对于高等教育让学习者——以及学习行为本身——更加成功,意味着重大机会。通过应用信息技术,现在的学习空间有可能成为新的学习范式,同时满足当前一代学生——网络世代大多数人的需求和期望。由于教育是高等教育的核心任务,学习和学习发生的场所是至关重要的。为了最好的服务于教育事业,我们必须设计学习空间,更好的融合网络世代、当前学习理论和信息技术。




This chapter establishes the links between Net Gen students, learning theory, and IT, showing their relevance to the concept of learning spaces. The definition of learning space has become broader and much more inclusive over the past decade. Learning theory will be discussed, as well as its implications for both Net Gen students and learning space design. The ties between this new conception of learning spaces and the habits and characteristics of Net Gen students will be established. Finally, scenarios will illustrate what these new spaces might look like.


本章确定网络世代学生、学习理论、信息技术之间的关联,呈现他们与学习空间这一概念的关系。在过去十年间,学习空间的定义已经变得更加宽泛,更具有包容性。我们将要讨论学习理论,以及对网络世代学生和学习空间设计的影响。将要明确学习空间这种新概念和网络世代学生的习惯特征之间的关联。最后,通过具体场景描述这些新的学习空间看上去会是什么样子。


What Are Learning Spaces?


什么是学习空间?


What does the term learning space mean? Why not use classroom instead? As recently as a decade ago, classrooms were the primary locus for learning in higher education. Other spaces included the library, the faculty office (for individual mentoring), and perhaps the café in town. But classrooms were by far the single most important space for learning.


“学习空间”这个词意味着什么?为什么不用“教室”来代替?就在十年前,教室还是高等教育的主要学习场所。其他空间包括图书馆、教师办公室(用于个别辅导),或许还包括街上的咖啡屋。但是到目前为止,教室曾经是惟一最重要的学习空间。




Since then, a great deal has changed. The World Wide Web has emerged as the primary way most people use the Internet. The Web has spawned a wealth of new, network-based applications, from digital music stores to new venues for scholarly publishing. Indeed, the availability of network access, in one form or another, is today almost taken for granted. Handheld devices have acquired a growing set of functions, providing a telephone, a digital camera, and an operating system running a variety of applications. Laptop prices have declined while increasing in functionality—to the point that their use exceeds that of desktops for most students.


自那时起,已有很大改变。万维网已成为大多数人使用互联网的主要方式。万维网催生了全新的、基于网络的财富,从数字音乐商店到新的学术出版场所。事实上,以各种形式提供的网络接入,在今天已经成为理所当然。手持设备各种功能不断增多,具有电话、数码相机功能和运行各种程序的操作系统。笔电的价格不断下降而性能不断提升——已经超过了台式机为大多数学生所能提供的用途。




In parallel with these developments in IT, an entire generation of learners has grown up using computers and other networked devices. While for previous generations IT was a kind of exotic overlay or an optional tool, for the Net Generation student IT is essential. It is clear that IT and Net Gen students have had a mutually influential—almost symbiotic—relationship. The characteristics of Net Gen students mesh very closely with IT and IT's increasing mobility, its 24 x 7 availability, and its increasing value as a communications tool. Net Gen students are social and team oriented, comfortable with multitasking, and generally positive in their outlook, and have a hands-on, "let's build it" approach—all encouraged by the IT resources at their disposal. Net Gen students have embraced IT, using it in ways both intended and unforeseen by programmers. Their rapid and enthusiastic adoption of IT has in turn influenced its development, particularly with respect to Web-based services.


在信息技术发展的同时,使用计算机和其它网络设备的整一代学习者已经成长起来。对于前几代人而言,信息技术只是一种外来物,备选工具,但是对于网络世代学生而言,信息技术则是必需品。显然,信息技术和网络世代学生之间存在相互影响——甚至共生——的关系。网络世代学生的特征与信息技术以及信息技术日益增加的流动性非常吻合,信息技术时时刻刻都可使用,作为通讯工具其价值越来越大。网络世代学生以社会和团队为导向,适宜于多任务活动,一般对其前景很乐观,有亲历亲为的习惯——都乐于在行事当中使用信息技术资源。网络世代学生接纳信息技术,在程序员意料之内和意料之外的方方面面都是用信息技术。他们迅速而积极使用信息技术,这反过来又影响到信息技术的发展,特别是在与网络服务相关方面。


The New Classroom


新教室


These developments impact the locus of learning in higher education. The notion of the classroom has both expanded and evolved; virtual space has taken its place alongside physical space.


这些发展影响了高等教育的学习场所。教室的概念已经得到扩展和改变,虚拟空间在现实场所边上取得一席之地。




Over the past decade, higher education has invested millions of dollars in classroom technology. The addition of document cameras, DVD players, Internet access, and projectors (to name a few) has added new functionality to the classroom. It is now possible to bring much more diverse materials to the classroom, to present them in a variety of ways, and to devise new classroom activities for students. As a result, the concept of the classroom has expanded to include this set of new functions.


在过去十年中,高等教育向教室技术投入数百万美元。除了文本提示机、DVD播放器、网络接入,还有投影仪(随便举个例子)也为教室增加了新功能。现在可以为教室带来更多元化的材料,以多种方式呈现这些材料,为学生设计新的课堂活动。因此,教室的概念已经扩展,包括了这些新功能。




These new classroom capabilities have, in turn, sparked interest in new pedagogical approaches. Wireless networking, for example, makes real-time or synchronous interaction (such as real-time polling) among all class participants a very real (and increasingly practical) possibility. Videoconferencing makes it feasible for an invited expert from a remote institution to join a class session. Discussions, notes, and other in-classroom events can be captured and disseminated for further study. It is important to note that these approaches mesh well with the habits of Net Gen students, such as their enjoyment of social interaction, their preference for experiential learning activities, and their use of technology. In these and other ways, technology acts as the lever that makes it possible to develop new and more effective pedagogies. Hence the classroom and the activities associated with it are evolving.


反过来,这些新的课堂功能,通过新的教学手段,闪现出新的兴趣点。比如说,无线网络为所有的课堂参与者进行实时或者同步互动(如实时投票),提供了非常真实(并且越来越真实)的可能性。视频会议,使得邀请远方机构专家参与课堂活动成为可能。讨论、笔记以及其他课堂内的事情都可以通过无线网络进行,并且为了进一步的学习而进行传播。重要的是要注意到,这些方法网络世代学生的习惯配合无间,比如他们享受社会互动,他们倾向于体验式学习活动,以及他们对技术的使用。在各种用途当中,技术充当杠杆,从而有可能开发出新的更有效的教学法。因此,课堂和与之关联的活动都发生了演变。




The resources used in higher education are increasingly digital and delivered via the network. In addition, network connectivity is increasingly portable. These two developments make it possible for learning to happen informally, in areas outside the traditional classroom, library, and faculty office. Student project teams can meet outside on the green, in a lounge, in any campus café—and they can meet almost any time of day. With wireless networking, numerous digital devices, and longer battery life, we are closer than ever to realizing the goal of fully ubiquitous access. This means that learning, too, can occur any time and anywhere.


高等教育使用的资源日渐数字化,日渐通过网络传输。此外,网络连接也越发便携。这两项发展使得学习的发生越发非正式,越发出现在传统课堂、图书馆和教师办公室以外的地方。学生项目小组可以在草坪、休息室、任何一间校园咖啡厅碰头,他们还可以在一天的任何时间碰头。由于有无线网络、众多数码设备、更长的电池寿命,我们比以往任何时候都更接近无处不在的接入这一目标。这也意味着,学习,可以发生在任何时间任何地点。




Net Gen students, using a variety of digital devices, can turn almost any space outside the classroom into an informal learning space. Similar to the traditional classroom, educators have an important opportunity to rethink and redesign these non-classroom spaces to support, encourage, and extend students' learning environment.


网络世代学生,使用各种数码设备,可以把课堂以外的任何场所都变成非正式学习空间。类似传统课堂,教育工作者有一个重大机会去重新思考重新设计这些非课堂空间,来支持、鼓励、扩展学生的学习环境。


Virtual Space


虚拟空间


These changes catalyzed by technology make it clear that the term classroom, at least in its traditional sense, can no longer encompass where learning takes place. Equally obvious is that the space in which learning takes place is no longer just physical; it is virtual as well. The virtual space is an entirely new environment. Virtual space is any location where people can meet using networked digital devices. We should understand virtual space in its widest sense, referring not just to synchronous, highly interactive functions (such as chat, blogs, and wikis) but also to asynchronous functions such as e-mail and discussion threads.


技术催生的这些改变,使得课堂这个词,至少在传统意义上,很清楚地表明,不再全然代表学习发生的场所。同样显而易见的是,学习发生的空间,也不再仅仅是现实场所,也可以是虚拟的。虚拟空间是全新的环境。只要人们能够通过网络数码设备会面,这样的地方就是虚拟空间。我们应该明白,最广泛意义上的虚拟空间,不仅指的是同步的、高互动性的功能(比如聊天、网志、维基),也指的是异步功能,比如电子邮件和论坛话题。




Unlike physical spaces, virtual spaces come and go. They can be spontaneous as well as deliberate, synchronous or asynchronous. Participants and their relationships in the virtual learning space can shift rapidly. Participants can also multitask, "inhabiting" more than one virtual space at a time. As networking technology matures and costs for devices such as laptops and handhelds decline, these virtual spaces play an increasingly larger role in all aspects of higher education.


不想现实场所,虚拟空间人来人往。他们可以率性而为,也可以深思熟虑,可以同步,也可以异步。虚拟空间的参与者及其人际关系,可以迅速变化。参与者也可以多任务活动,同一时间“身处”多个虚拟空间。随着网络技术的成熟,加上笔电和手持设备等设备的费用降低,虚拟空间在高等教育的各个方面都扮演着越来越重要的角色。




Again an IT-based function—virtual space—meshes closely with Net Gen characteristics. Net Gen students are mobile, as is virtual space. Net Gen students are facile at multitasking and moving back and forth (sometimes rapidly) between real and virtual spaces. Net Gen students are comfortable with the fast tempo that this kind of multitasking implies. In short, virtual space is tailor-made for the work habits of Net Gen students.


虚拟空间,又一个完全吻合网络世代特征的信息技术功能。正如虚拟空间一样,网络世代学生也是移动的。网络世代学生擅长于多任务、在真实与虚拟空间之间来回移动(有时候很快)。网络世代学生适应这类多任务活动的快节奏。总之,虚拟空间就是专门为网络世代学生这些工作习惯定制的。




It is clear that the virtual space is taking its place along side the classroom and other physical locations as a locus for learning. The result is that we are compelled to expand our concept of where learning occurs. Learning spaces encompass the full range of places in which learning occurs, from real to virtual, from classroom to chat room.


显然,虚拟空间正发生于课堂和其他现实学习场所附近。其结果是,我们不得不扩大我们对学习场所的认识。学习空间完全包含了发生学习的各种场所,从真实的到虚拟的,从课堂到聊天室。


Learning Theory


学习理论


A shift in the teaching and learning paradigm is well under way, moving away from a transmission paradigm to a constructivist paradigm. In 1900, basic literacy skills included reading, writing, and calculation. Knowing meant being able to remember and repeat, which was appropriate to an industrial age in which practices changed slowly (at least by today's standards). Workers anticipated having a single profession for the duration of their working lives. Education was based on a factory-like, "one size fits all" model. Talent was developed by weeding out those who could not do well in a monochromatic learning environment.


教育和学习模式正在顺利的发生转变,从传递模式转移到建构主义模式。一九〇〇年,基本的文明技能包含阅读书写和算术。“知道”意味着能够回忆起并复述出来,这与工业化时代缓慢变化(按照今天的标准来看)的行为相适应。在工人工作前就为他们一生的工作准备好了一份永久的专业。教育采用的就是跟工厂一样的“一刀切”模式。人才是通过淘汰掉那些不能适应单一学习环境的人,得出的。




The postindustrial age is characterized by rapid change. Literary skills now include critical thought, persuasive expression, and the ability to solve complex scientific and organizational problems. Knowing now means using a well-organized set of facts to find new information and to solve novel problems. In 1900, learning consisted largely of memorization; today it relies chiefly on understanding.


后工业时代的特点就是变化很快。现在的文明技能包含批判性思维、有说服力的表达、有解决复杂的科学和组织问题的能力。现在,“知道”意味着使用组织良好的一系列事实,去发现新的信息、解决新的问题。在一九〇〇年,学习需要大量记忆,现在依赖的多半是理解。




This shift has come about partly due the emergence of a constructivist theory of learning. Stated simply, this theory holds that learners construct knowledge by understanding new information building on their current understanding and expertise. Constructivism contradicts the idea that learning is the transmission of content to a passive receiver. Instead, it views learning as an active process, always based on the learner's current understanding or intellectual paradigm. Knowledge is constructed by assimilating new information into the learner's knowledge paradigm. A learner does not come to a classroom or a course Web site with a mind that is a tabula rasa, a blank slate. Each learner arrives at a learning "site" with some preexisting level of understanding.


这种转变的出现部分归因于建构主义学习理论的出现。简单地说,该理论认为,学习者通过理解新信息,在他们当前已有理解和经验基础上建构知识。建构主义反对学习是向被动接受者传输内容这种思想。相反,它认为学习是积极过程,总是基于学习者当前的理解和智力模式。知识的建构,是通过同化新信息到学习者已有知识模式中进行的。学习者并不需要带着婴儿般纯洁的心灵前往课堂或者课程网站。抵达学习“场所”的每一位学习者都带有一些业已存在的认识水平。




Knowledge exists at multiple levels, ranging from novice to expert. It is the sophistication and depth of this understanding that differentiates experts from novices. Experts have a deep and rich set of well-organized facts, as well as the capacity to use that understanding to solve problems in their fields of expertise. Novices lack that depth and, as a result, have a much harder time solving problems.


只是存在于多个层次,从新手到专家不等。知识的复杂程度和理解程度用以区分专家和新手。专家掌握的事实深入、丰富、组织良好,并且具有运用理解去解决专业领域问题的才能。新手缺乏这种深度,因此,必须花费更多时间来解决问题。




The constructivist theory has important implications. The theory implies that learning is best served when it is:


建构主义理论具有重要意义。该理论认为只有在以下情况中,学习才能达到最好效果:




  • Contextual—taking into account the student's understanding

  • 情境:重视学生的理解


  • Active—engaging students in learning activities that use analysis, debate, and criticism (as opposed to simply memorization) to receive and test information

  • 活跃:鼓励学生在学习活动中使用分析、讨论和批评(而不是简单的背诵)来接受和测试信息。


  • Social—using discussions, direct interaction with experts and peers, and team-based projects

  • 社交:运用讨论,与同伴、专家的直接互动,基于小组的项目研究。


Problem-based learning, which encourages learners to construct knowledge based on the experience of solving problems, is significantly different from methods such as recall and repetition. This is but one of many ways the older, traditional teaching paradigm contrasts with the learning paradigm. Table 1 summarizes some (though by no means all) other important ways these two paradigms differ.


问题导向式学习,鼓励学习者根据解决问题获得的经验建构知识,与回忆和重复等方法有着相助的不同。这不过是传统教学模式与这种学习模式相比,诸多不同的一种。表一总结了两种模式的一些(但不是全部)其他重要方面的区别。




Table 1. Differences in the Teaching and Learning Paradigms


表一:教育学习模式的区别
































































Traditional Paradigm

"Teaching"
Constructivist Paradigm

"Learning"
MemorizationUnderstanding
RecallDiscovery
One size fits allTailored; option rich
Talent via weeding outTalent cultivated and sought out
RepetitionTransfer and construction
Acquisition of factsFacts + conceptual framework
Isolated factsOrganized conceptual schemas
TransmissionConstruction
Teacher = master and commanderTeacher = expert and mentor
Fixed rolesMobile roles
Fixed classroomsMobile, convertible classrooms
Single locationPlurality of locations and space types
Summative assessmentSummative and formative assessment

.



























































传统教学模式建构主义学习模式
记忆理解
回忆发现
一刀切定制,充满选择
筛选人才培养人才
重复迁移与建构
获取事实事实加上概念框架
孤立事实有组织的概念图式
传输建构
教师=师傅加上指挥官教师=专家加上精神导师
一成不变的角色机动任务
固定教室移动的可变的教室
单一地点多元化的地点和空间类型
总结性评估总结性和形成性评价


Learning science research also highlights the importance of learner engagement, or as the American Psychological Association describes it, intentional learning.1 This means that learners must have a "metaperspective" from which to view and assess their own learning, which is often referred to as metacognition.2 An active learning environment provides the opportunity to assess one's own learning, enabling learners to make decisions about the course, as well as reflect on and assess their progress. In the past, the measure of learning was the final grade (a summative measure). But a final grade is merely a measure of the student's performance on tests. It does not measure the learning that did—or did not—take place. To encourage learning, summative testing or assessments must be combined with formative assessments. Formative assessment is not directly associated with the final grade; it helps learners understand their learning and make decisions about next steps based on that understanding.


学习科学的研究也强调学习者参与的重要性,正如美国心理学会所描述的,主动学习。这意味着学习者必须有观察评价自身学习的“元观点”,这通常被称作元认知。积极的学习环境能够为评估某人自身学习提供机会,让学习者为课程拿主意,以及思考和评估自己的进度。在过去,衡量学习要靠期末成绩(总结性评价)。而期末成绩基本上只是该生的考试表现,它并不能衡量学习是否发生。为了鼓励学习,总结性考试和评估必须要结合形成性评估。形成性评估并不跟期末成绩直接有关,但是它帮助学习者理解他们的学习,并根据这种理解调整接下来的步伐。


Net Generation and Learning Theory


网络世代与学习理论


As with IT, there are overlaps between the working characteristics of Net Gen students and practices that research has shown encourage and strengthen learning. For example, the Net Generation is social. They like to stay in touch with peers (and even parents!). They have a preference for group activity and working in teams. This dovetails with research indicating that learning is encouraged when it includes social components such as debate or direct engagement with peers and experts. Learning is strengthened through social interactions, interpersonal relations, and communication with others.


信息技术与网络世代学生的工作特征存在重叠,实践研究显示,这能鼓励并强化学习。比如说,网络世代是社会化的。他们喜欢与同伴(甚至是家长!)保持接触。他们偏好集体活动、团队工作。研究显示,当学习中包含社会化元素比如讨论和直接接触同伴与专家的时候,这种吻合能够促进学习。通过社会化互动、人际关系、与他人交流,学习得到强化。




Net Generation students are achievement and goal oriented. Their question is not "What does it mean?" or "How does it work?" (as previous generations were inclined to ask), but rather "How do I build it?" This predilection maps to learning theory's emphasis on active learning. Discovery, exploration, experimentation, criticism, analysis—all represent active learning, a style that suits the Net Gen well.


网络世代学生追求成就与目标。他们问的不是“这意味着什么?”或者“它是怎么工作的?”(前几代人倾向于这么问),而是问“我该如何建造它?”这种偏好对应着学习理论的积极学习这一重点。发现,探索,实验,批评,分析,都代表积极学习,这是很好适应网络世代的学习风格。




A pedagogy that emphasizes active learning has additional "targets of opportunity" among the Net Gen characteristics. Net Gen students are experiential, tending toward learning by doing rather than listening. Research indicates that learners need to be active with respect to their own learning process and assessment. Net Gen students' goal and achievement orientation comes into play here: that achievement focus can be directed toward quizzes and exercises that assist learners in evaluating their progress toward learning goals.


强调积极学习的教学法在网络世代特征之间增加了“机会目标”。网络世代学生偏好体验,倾向于通过实践而非倾听来学习。研究显示,学习者需要主动尊重自身的学习过程和评估。网络世代学生的目标和成就导向开始在这些方面发挥作用:可以将对成就的关注导向测验与练习,这可以帮助学习者评估他们通过学习目标的进度。




Obviously not all forms of learning must be social or team-based. In a variety of learning contexts, individual work is important. It may well be that Net Gen students' strengths are also their weaknesses. The expectation for fast-paced, rapidly shifting interaction coupled with a relatively short attention span may be counterproductive in many learning contexts. Repetition and steady, patient practice—key to some forms of mastery—may prove difficult for Net Gen students. Designing courses for them necessitates balancing these strengths and weaknesses.


显然,不是所有的学习形式都必须是社会化的或以团队为基础的。在各种学习环境中,个人工作是最重要的。网络世代学生的优势很有可能变成他们的弱点。对于快节奏、快速改变互动,加上相对较短的注意力时间的期望,在很多学习环境中有可能是无效的。重复的、稳定的、有耐心的实践——掌握某些形式的关键——会对网络世代学生造成困难。为他们设计课程,需要平衡他们的优点和缺点。


Learning Space Implications


学习空间的意义


There are a number of implications of learning theory and the Net Generation for learning spaces. The convergence of the learning paradigm, IT, and the Net Gen is occurring now at colleges and universities. Current and future planning must encompass and encourage this convergence by thinking of learning spaces (classroom, informal, virtual) as a single, integrated environment. We should not neglect the informal for the formal, or assume that Net Gen students somehow will figure out the virtual space on their own. We should connect what happens in the classroom with what happens in informal and virtual spaces.


学习理论和网络世代对于学习空间有很多影响。学习模式、信息技术以及网络世代,现在正在高校集中在一起。当前与未来的规划必须通过关心学习空间(教室、非正式的、虚拟的)来包容并鼓励这种集中,将其整合为单一的统一的环境。我们不能因为正式学习空间就怠慢非正式学习空间,也不能假定网络世代学生自然而然就能弄明白虚拟空间。我们应该将在教室里所发生的与在非正式学习空间和虚拟空间中发生的联系起来。




This implies that institutions may need to rethink their vision for learning and the spaces in which it occurs. Creating a vision for learning and learning spaces is a powerful leverage point; it informs almost all other decisions about learning space design. A vision also allows us to effectively articulate to all constituents what we are trying to accomplish. The vision helps organize all participants in the design and implementation of these spaces as well as the activities they support. Simply installing wireless access points and fresh carpeting isn't enough if done in isolation; such improvements pay real dividends only if they are in concert with the institution's overall teaching and learning objectives. It is the vision that generates the design principles that will, in turn, be used to make key decisions about how learning spaces are configured.


这意味着教育机构可能需要重新思考他们对于学习和学习发生的空间的愿景。建立起对学习和学习空间的愿景,具有很重要的影响,它几乎对有关学习空间设计的所有其他决定都有影响。建立起愿景,也让我们向所有成员有效表达我们正在努力达成的是什么。有愿景,可以帮助我们组织管理所有参与者设计、应用这些空间,以及他们所支持的活动。如果仅仅是安装无线接入点、铺设新地毯是不够的,这些改进只有在他们与教育机构的整体教育学习目标相一致的情况下,才能获得收益。反过来,愿景产生的设计原则,将被用于形成有关学习空间如何配置的重大决定。




One important implication is that the vocabulary we use to describe what learners do in these spaces must become active. We must go beyond describing ways to help the instructor to be active; we must include students as well. The vision and design principles should emphasize the options students have as active participants in the learning process. Design principles should include terms such as analyze, create, criticize, debate, present, and classify—all directed at what the space enables the students to do. For example, students should be able to present materials to the class. Outside class, they should have access to applications and materials that directly support analysis of data, text, and other media. Forums for discussion and critical debate, both real and virtual, are key to encouraging learning and will be looked for by Net Gen students.


一个重要的影响是,我们用来描述学习者在这些学习空间的词汇,必须变得活跃。我们必须超越描述,去帮助教育者变得积极,我们还必须包括学生。愿景与设计原则应该强调学生在学习过程中作为积极参与者的作用。设计原则应该包含分析,创建,批评,辩论,展示和分类等词汇,所有词汇都指向学习空间能让学生做的事情。比如说,学生应该能够向全班展示材料。课外,他们应该能够访问直接支持分析数据文本和其它媒体的应用程序和素材。用于讨论和批判式辩论的论坛,包括真实的和虚拟的,都是鼓励学习的关键,也是网络世代学生所希望的。




Learning spaces should accommodate the use of as many kinds of materials as possible and enable the display of and access to those materials by all participants. Learning space needs to provide the participants—instructors and students alike—with interactive tools that enable exploration, probing, and examination. This might include a robust set of applications installed on the computer that controls the room's displays, as well as a set of communication tools. Since the process of examination and debate leads to discovery and the construction of new knowledge, it could be important to equip spaces with devices that can capture classroom discussion and debate, which can be distributed to all participants for future reference and study.


学习空间应当允许尽可能使用各种素材,允许所有参与者看见这些素材、获取这些素材。学习空间需要为参与者——教师和同等地位的学生——提供互动工具,让他们可以探究、探讨、检查。这包括安装在计算机上的健壮应用程序,控制着室内照明,以及一系列通讯设施。由于检查和讨论的过程会引起新发现、建构新知识,重要的是,为能够记录课堂讨论与争辩的设备准备场所,这样可以分发给以后想要参考和学习的所有参与者。




Learning does not stop once the instructor has left the classroom. Instead, the end of the class meeting marks a transition from one learning mode to another. As a result, institutions must address real and virtual spaces outside the classroom to ensure that they, too, encourage learning. For example, there should be access to class materials (which are increasingly digital) so that the active and social work of learning can continue outside the formal classroom. The design of "neutral" spaces, such as hallways and corridors, could be rethought and re-equipped to promote learning. Some institutions provide small discussion spaces in corridors so that discussion begun in class can continue when class ends. As for the virtual space, institutions should consider well-integrated work environments that support collaborative projects and resource sharing.


在教师离开教室之后,学习不会停止。相反,课堂的结束,标志着从一种学习模式转变到另一种。因此,教育机构必须解决课堂之外的真实和虚拟学习空间,以确保并鼓励他们学习。比如,在这些学习空间可以获取课堂素材(这些素材的数字化程度越来越高),这样可以在正式课堂之外继续开展这些学习活动和社会化学习工作。“中性空间”的设计,比如走廊和过道,可以重新考虑重新装备,以促进学习。某些教育机构在过道提供小型讨论空间,这样,开始于课堂的讨论可以在课后继续进行。对于虚拟空间,教育机构应该考虑整合良好的工作环境,以支持合作项目和资源共享。




Informal learning spaces—those outside the classrooms—present particularly intriguing opportunities for pioneering and cultivating new teaching and learning practices. These spaces, while informal, are key areas for student academic work. Students spend far more time in these spaces than they do in formal classrooms. Research, Web browsing, writing, statistical analysis, and compiling lab reports all take place in the library, study hall, media center, dorm room, and learning commons. Because of their enthusiasm for IT and their experiential, hands-on approach to learning tasks, Net Gen students will easily "tune into" the virtual aspects of informal spaces. Well-designed and integrated physical layouts and IT "tool sets" will find a ready audience with Net Gen students.


非正式学习空间——课堂之外的种种——为开拓和培养新的教学学习实践,提供了特别吸引人的机会。这些学习空间,尽管不够正式,但是学生学术工作的重要场所。学生在这些场所花费的时间远多于在正式课堂的时间。研究、浏览网页、写作、数据分析、编写实验报告,都发生在实验室、自修室、媒体中心、宿舍,并且都是一起学习。因为网络世代学生对信息技术的热忱、他们的经验、亲历亲为的方法,他们的学习任务很容易就和非正式学习空间的虚拟部分相协调。精心设计的、高度集成的物理布局、信息技术工具集,很容易获得网络世代学生的青睐。


Scenarios


场景


If we could implement this new vision of how learning occurs by buying the right kind of chair, purchasing projectors with sufficient lumens, or installing digital whiteboards, learning space design would be simple. Obviously it is much more complex—the task of designing and implementing learning environments that encourage good learning practice and accommodate the Net Gen learning style is a challenging one.


如果我们通过购买恰当的桌椅,采购足够流明的投影仪、安装数码白板,就能够实现这种学习如何发生的新愿景,那么学习空间设计一定会很简单。显然,事实上要复杂得多——设计与实施能够鼓励好的学习实践、适应网络世代的学习风格的学习环境,这样的任务足够困难。




A starting point is to try to imagine what these new spaces might look like and how students would function in them. Creating scenarios helps define functions, usage practices, and design goals. Consider the following three scenarios as examples.


出发点之一就是尝试想像一下,这些新的学习空间看上去会是什么样子,以及学生会如何使用它们。创建场景有助于帮助定义功能、使用方式、设定目标。作为例子,考虑以下三个场景。


Scenario 1: The New Lecture Hall


场景一:新的演讲厅


Sandra, a junior, is heading to her psychology class, which meets at 10:00 a.m. It's a relatively large class for her liberal arts college, with some 150 students, so it meets in a lecture hall. As she arrives, she sees that the professor has, as usual, both projection screens lowered, one showing course material, the other displaying the familiar "voting" screen. Sandra finds a seat among some friends and begins "moving in" to her space. This lecture hall is of relatively recent vintage; its seats and paired tables make it much easier to deploy and use her "tools," which include printouts of the day's reading, as well as a small laptop computer. Her fellow students are doing likewise. Each of them is using some device to access the course's Web site—some with laptops, others with tablet computers, still others with handheld computers. Using wireless connections, they all access the course's Web site and navigate to the site's "voting" page.


桑德拉,大学新生,正前往心理学课堂,上午十时上课。在他所在的文理学院这是一门相对比较大的课程,有大约一百五十名学生,因此放在讲演厅举行。他到的时候,他看见教授,像往常一样,已经放下投影屏幕,一张显示着课程素材,另一张显示着熟悉的投票界面。桑德拉在朋友中间坐了下来,开始进入角色。讲演厅最近才投入使用,它的桌椅很方便部署使用桑德拉自带的“工具”,包括每天阅读材料的打印版,以及小型笔电。他的同学做着同样的事情。每个学生都在使用某种设备访问课程网站——有些使用笔电,有些使用平板电脑,还有一些使用手持电脑。通过无线连接,他们都能访问课程网站,浏览网站的投票页面。





Figure 1. Technology-Supported Lecture Hall


图一:技术支持下的演讲厅





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





The professor commences her lecture. In one of the older lecture halls, she might have been tied to the lectern so that she could click through her PowerPoint slides. Or she might have abandoned her slides in order to write on the blackboard while her students scribbled notes in their notebooks. But in this newly renovated lecture hall, she and her students have many more options. She has what the campus technology office calls a "magic wand," a radio-frequency controller that enables her to operate her computer—as well as many of the classroom's functions—wirelessly, from any point in the room. She can capture anything she writes on the blackboard and make it available to her students on the course Web site. Freed from needing to take extensive notes, the students are able to participate more fully in the class discussion. Finally, the professor is carrying a small recorder that captures her lecture, digitizes the audio, and uploads it to the course Web site for the students to review when they prepare for finals.


教授开始讲课。在老演讲厅,他可能会受到演讲台的约束,因为他需要点击演示文稿。他也有可能离开演示文稿,以便乘学生疯狂笔记的时候在黑板上书写。但是在这个新装修的演讲厅,他和学生有更多选择。他有校园技术办公室所谓的“魔棒”,无线电频率控制器,可以让他在教室任何地方遥控计算机——就像许多课堂上一样。他可以保存写在黑板上的所有文字图形,放上课程网站提供给学生使用。学生从记录大量笔记中解脱出来,能够充分参与更多课堂讨论。最后,教授用一个微型录音机记录下讲课,讲音频数字化,上传到课程网站,让学生期末准备时复习。





Figure 2. PDA/Handheld Computer


图二、PDA/手持计算机





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





Today she begins class by circulating through the room, using aisles that create paths through the students' seats. As she roams, she calls on students to share reactions to the readings. She encourages other students to offer additional comments. Soon there is some debate about the reading, which is facilitated by the room's rows of paired tables and swivel chairs, making it possible to maintain eye contact with nearly everyone in the room.


现在,他刚开始上课的时候巡历整个教室,在学生座位之间的过道中穿插。在他漫步的时候,他点名学生分享对阅读材料的思考。他鼓励其他学生发表不同意见。很快,针对阅读材料就产生了一些辩论,教室里一对对课桌和旋转椅子的排列方式也是促进因素,因为这能让教室内几乎所有人都进行眼神交流。




At one point in the discussion, Sandra sketches a diagram on her laptop that she feels helps explain the concepts being discussed. She asks the professor if she could show it to the class. The professor agrees, and Sandra launches the classroom's screen sharing application. Within a few seconds, her computer's screen is projected on the room's main screen. The class discussion focuses on this diagram, and the professor, using a virtual pencil, is able to make notes on the diagram. The diagram and notes are captured and placed on the class Web site for review.


在讨论某个要点的时候,桑德拉在笔电上勾画了一幅图例,他觉得有助于阐述正在讨论的概念。他问教授是否可以展示给全班。教授同意了,桑德拉运行课堂屏幕分享程序。几秒钟后,他的计算机屏幕就投影到教室的主屏幕上。全班开始讨论这幅图例,教授使用虚拟铅笔在图例上做注释。图例和注释被保存下来,放在课程网站上,便于复习。




Soon the debate gets stuck; the students can't resolve the issue. The professor goes to the podium, types briefly, and then asks the students to go to a URL to see a question and to choose the answer they feel is correct. The students access the Web page from laptops, handhelds, or wireless IP-based phones. In two minutes they have completed the poll and submitted their responses. The results are quickly tabulated and displayed. The wide diversity of opinion surprises everyone. The professor reframes the issue, without giving the answer, and the students continue to discuss it. She repeats the poll; this time there is more agreement among the students, enabling her to move the discussion forward.


不久,讨论卡住了,学生们不能解决问题。教授走上讲台,简单打几个字,要求学生去一个网址看一个问题,选择他们认为正确的答案。学生们通过笔电、手持、无线上网手机等访问该网页。两分钟他们就完成了调查并提交选择。结果很快生成表格显示出来。每个人都惊讶于答案的多样性。教授重新构造这个问题,不再给出答案,学生继续讨论。教授重复调查题,这次更多学生的意见达成一致,教授结束讨论继续上课。





Figure 3. Handheld Computers in Class


图三、课堂上的手持计算机





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





Halfway through the class period, the professor pauses the conversation. She goes to the podium computer and clicks on a few links, and soon a videoconferencing session is displayed on the right-hand screen. She has arranged to have a colleague of hers "drop in" on the class to discuss a point that is in the colleague's particular area of expertise. The class has a conversation with the expert, who is at large research institution more than 500 miles away. Students listen to the expert's comments and are able to pose questions using one of the three cordless microphones available to the class. On the left-hand screen, the visiting professor shows some images and charts that help explain the concepts under discussion.


这堂课上到一半,教授停下讲课。他走到演讲台计算机前,点击了几个链接,很快在右手屏幕打开了一次视频会议。他安排了一位同事“空降”到课上,因为讨论的重点就是该同事的专家领域。课堂与这位专家展开会话,专家身处一千八百里外的大型研究机构。学生听取专家的意见,使用三个无线话筒提出问题。在左手边的屏幕上,访问教授展示了一些图像图表,辅助解释正在讨论的概念。




The professor concludes the day's class by showing a lab sign-up form, available on the course's Web site. Sandra is able to access the Web page almost instantly with her handheld computer and succeeds in signing up for lab times that work well with her schedule. It was good she didn't wait, for within 10 minutes of the end of class, the other students in her class have signed up for most of the slots, conferring with friends using chat programs to ensure that they sign up for the same lab slots.


教授最后出示课程网站上的一份实验室签约表单,结束了这堂课。桑德拉可以使用他的手持计算机几乎实时访问这张网页,并成功签约实验时间,恰好在他的工作时间安排之内。这样很好,他没有等待就完成签约,在课堂最后十分钟,课堂上其他学生已经签完大多数机位,并通过聊天程序和朋友商量,以确保他们签约到相同的机位。


Scenario 2: Using the Virtual Learning Space


场景二:使用虚拟学习空间


When the class concludes, Sandra turns to her neighbor to ask about several points the professor made in class. This attracts two other students, who enter the conversation. As the discussion continues, they are joined by the professor, who is heading out. Since another class is beginning to file in, the professor suggests they move outside the room to continue the discussion. They find one of the "discussion pockets" unoccupied and move in. The discussion pocket is the college's term for a small, curved space with a table and bench to accommodate a meeting of four or five people. Found outside the newer classrooms, they are handy for informal, spontaneous discussions. Sandra's group moves into the pocket and for the next 15 minutes continue their "spill over" discussion of the class.


下课之后,桑德拉转身问他邻桌教授在课上提的几个重点。这吸引到另外两个学生,他们也参与交谈。随着讨论的进行,教授也加入进来,当时他正往外走。由于要开始上另外一堂课,教授建议他们在教室外继续讨论。他们找到一个空闲的“讨论角”。在这所学校,讨论角是一个很小的弯曲的场所,有桌子和长凳,为四五个人提供交谈的场所。在新教室周围,他们很容易就展开非正式的自然而然的讨论。桑德拉这一伙人走到这个角落,在接下来的十五分钟里继续他们延伸自课堂的讨论。




After this informal discussion concludes, Sandra heads to the library; she has an hour until her next class and needs to get some work done. She finds some table space, pulls out her laptop, books, and iPod and sets to work. She checks on her e-mail and sends some responses. Three friends "drop in" on her via the chat program, and she spends a few more minutes conversing with all three on separate subjects. That done, she fires up her iPod to listen to some music she downloaded using her subscription to the official campus online music service.


非正式讨论结束后,桑德拉去往图书馆,离他下一节课还有一个小时,有些工作需要完成。他找到空座位,拿出笔电、书本、iPod,开始工作。检查邮件,发送回信。三个朋友突然通过聊天程序找到他,他花了几分钟时间讨论三个不同的话题。之后,打开iPod听音乐,这是从校园官方在线音乐服务中注册下载的。





Figure 4. Technology in the Library


图四、图书馆中的技术





Photo: Will Faller, Vassar College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,威尔·佛乐





Now she begins work on a term paper for a history class. She rummages through the library's online collection, looking for a map she needs to illustrate a point about 19th-century Asian history. She finds what she is looking for: although the map image is held by the library at a college on the other side of the country, Sandra has access to these resources. She is able to retrieve the map and insert into her document. She then traces arrows over the image to point out items important to the points she is making.


现在他开始为历史课准备学期论文。他遍寻图书馆的在线收藏,寻找他需要的一幅地图,用来说明十九世纪亚洲历史。他发现他要找的这幅地图在国内另外一所大学的图书馆,桑德拉获得这些资源。他可以拿到这幅地图,插入他的文档。然后他在图上画上一些箭头,指出他正在研究的重要条目。




Again a friend drops in via chat, but this time it is about the joint presentation they are preparing for another class.


又有一位朋友通过聊天访问他,但这次是关于他们为另外一门课准备的联合发言的。





Figure 5. IP-Based Chat


图五、基于网络的聊天





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





They are able to have an audio chat; Sandra's friend is in her dorm room, and Sandra is in a remote corner of the library where conversation will not disturb others. As their discussion progresses, they go to the course's Web site and launch the virtual whiteboard to diagram some concepts. They develop a conceptual diagram—drawing, erasing, and revising it until they agree the diagram is correct. They both download a copy. Sandra volunteers to work on polishing the diagram and will leave a copy of the final diagram in her share folder in her online portfolio "locker."


他们通过语音聊天,桑德拉的朋友在宿舍,桑德拉在图书馆一个偏僻角落,这样交谈就不会干扰其他人。讨论着,他们来到课程网站,运行虚拟白板,画出一些概念图例。他们俩都下载了一份副本。桑德拉资源美化这幅图例,在他网上学习档案的的共享文件夹里留了一份副本。





Figure 6. Virtual Workspace Anywhere


图六、无处不在的虚拟工作空间





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





Sandra returns to work on her term paper and decides a half hour later to take a break. She again checks e-mail, chats briefly with a friend about their upcoming soccer game, and switches playlists on her iPod. Then she remembers that she needs to review some Italian newscasts for her Italian class. The files containing the newscast video are on her iPod, so she plugs her iPod into her laptop, finds the video files, and launches her viewer application. Plugging her headphones into her computer, she is able to watch the entire segment, making notes on parts she did not fully understand. She then checks the class's Web site and sees there is an additional set of video files for reviewing. She downloads these quickly onto her iPod. Noting the time, Sandra packs up her gear and heads off to her next class, stopping once at a stand-up e-mail station to see the latest messages that have arrived in her inbox.


桑德拉继续他的学期论文,决定半个小时后休息一下。他再次检查邮件,与朋友简单聊着即将到来的足球比赛,同时切换iPod上的播放列表。他想到他需要为意大利语课程复习一些新闻广播。这些新闻广播视频都在他的iPod中,他把iPod插入笔电,这样他可以观看所有视频片段,在没有完全明白的部分上做注释。然后检查课程网站,看到新增得有一套用于复习的视频文件。他很快下载这些文件到他的iPod。注意到已经到点,桑德拉整理行李,赶赴下一堂课,中间在一个立式邮件亭停下来看收到的最后一份信息。


Scenario 3: From the Information Commons to the Learning Commons


场景三:从信息共享到学习共享


Had sophomore Martin come to the university at the same time as his older sister some six years earlier, he would have found, as she did, a computer lab. This was a large room, located in the basement of the science building, filled with benches and seats. At each seat was a computer. A set of documentation racks were on one side of the room; some documents were in short supply, while others were obsolete. On the other side was a help desk, staffed by students with a finite set of answers to the infinite variety of questions directed at them. Finding a free computer, particularly at the end of the term, was a challenge. Once you arrived at an available computer, there was little room for all your study materials: books, backpack, coat, and folders. The administration, anxious to maximize student access to computers, had crammed as many workstations as they could into the space.


大二学生马丁来到六年前他姐姐读过的大学。和姐姐一样,他会找到计算机实验室。这是一间很大的教室,位于科学楼的地下层,塞满了桌椅。每套桌椅放一台计算机。在教室的一边有一套文件架,上面放着一些供不应求的文件,尽管都已经过时了。另一边是咨询台,有学生在值班,面对各种各样的问题,他们只能做出有限的回答。想要找到空闲计算机,特别是在期末的时候,实在是困难。就算你找到空闲计算机,也没有多少地方摆放你那一大堆学习材料:书籍、背包、外衣、文件夹。管理层急于让尽可能多的学生用上计算机,在这里塞进了尽可能多的工作站。




While the computers worked fine for the most part (though cleaning them up after previous users was sometimes a chore), getting help was a problem. To get help—for the use of an application or for a research question—required going to the second floor for IT help or to the main floor of the library for research help. That meant leaving your computer unguarded, possibly to be claimed by another student equally hungry for computer time. So you ended up rarely going for help but instead muddled through as best you could, perhaps asking the student next to you when you were desperate.


虽然这些计算机大部分运行良好(尽管在前一批用户使用之后进行清理,是件苦差事),但要获得帮助也是个问题。要获得帮助——出于使用某应用程序、某研究问题——寻求信息技术帮助需要去图书馆二楼,寻求研究帮助需要去一楼。这意味着要离开计算机,这就有可能被另一位同样渴求计算机的学生占去。于是,最终你极少寻求帮助,而是尽己所能,糊里糊涂,或者会在绝望的时候问附近的学生。




But today Martin arrives at the first floor of the library and goes to a set of rooms collectively called the Learning Commons. At the threshold of the commons is the peer-tutoring room, a place where students can drop in and receive peer-based help with writing, research, or IT issues. Martin stops by to ask about incorporating MPEG-4 audio files into a PowerPoint presentation he's due to give next week for an anthropology course. At the same time, he is able to get some questions answered about relevant online journals for his research project in psychology.


但是今天,马丁到了图书馆一楼,去往若干统称为学习共享厅的教室。在共享厅门口,是同伴教学室,可以让学生接受突然拜访、接受同伴帮助解决写作、研究、信息技术问题。马丁停下来问如何将MPEG-4音频文件插入演示文稿,因为他下周需要提交给人类学课程。同时,有人回答了他心理学研究项目在线期刊相关问题。




Martin checks the time and heads to a work team pod—a small, horseshoe shaped table with a computer and large display—where he meets classmates from his chemistry course. The pod enables the work group to share the display and collectively work on materials. Martin works for an hour with three other students, reviewing drafts for their essays, checking online materials, and revising the Web site they are putting together for their collaborative project on the molecular properties of the surfaces of liquids.


马丁看了看时间,前往团队工作间——小型房间,有一张马蹄形桌子,一台计算机,很大的显示器,在这里他和化学课同学碰头。团队工作间可以让工作小组分享显示器,一起处理素材。马丁和其他三位同学工作了一个小时,审查论文草稿,查看在线素材,修订他们关于液体表面分子属性的协作项目网站。





Figure 7. Learning Commons


图七、共享学习





Photo: Roberto Marques, USITE/Crerar Computing Laboratory Seminar Area, University of Chicago


摄影:罗伯托·马克斯,芝加哥大学,USITE /克里勒计算实验室地区研讨会





Once that meeting is complete, he locates a free spot, pulls his laptop out of his backpack, and spends the half hour before his next team meeting doing a wide variety of things, including chatting with half a dozen friends about their party plans for the weekend. At the same time, he sends an e-mail to one of the TAs for the chemistry course, asking for clarification of an assignment. He also browses the Web, zeroing in on a Web site at another college that is relevant to his anthropology course work, as well as seeing if the latest CD from his favorite band is available through the Music Store. In a few minutes, he has purchased several tracks from it and downloaded them onto his computer.


会议结束后,他找到一个空位子,从背包中拿出笔电,在第二个小组会议开始之前花了半个小时做各种事情,包括与五六个朋友聊周末聚会安排。同时,给化学课助教发了一封信,请求解释功课。还浏览网页,专注于另一所学校的网站,有和他人类学功课有关的资料,还在看他最爱的乐队最新唱片是否摆上音乐商店。几分钟里,他就购买了几首曲子,下载到计算机。




Martin checks the time again. It's 10:00 p.m., and there's still a great deal to get done. He divides his time across several course assignments, numerous chat sessions, and reading (both from paper and from his computer screen). After a time, feeling drowsy, he goes to the Midnight Café, buys a soda and some chips, and returns to his work.


马丁再次看时间。现在是晚上十点,仍然有很多事情要做。他把时间分配给好几项课程任务、无数聊天活动,以及阅读材料(包括纸质和计算机屏幕)。过了段时间,觉得想睡,前往午夜咖啡厅,买了瓶汽水、一些薯片,然后继续工作。




At 11:30 p.m., Martin packs his gear and heads to another part of the commons, the Media Studio, which offers a number of stations for students to use for more advanced work with video and audio. Martin is working with a team of four other students on an assignment for a film studies course. Their task is to find clips from a set of films that illustrate a particular filming technique and to explain why it is effective. They rendezvous at a group station and spend the next hour reviewing films and identifying the clips they will use. They ask the student consultant on duty about whether it would be better to collect these in a single clip or as separate clips. By 12:45 a.m. Martin and his teammates have made their selections and given themselves tasks for the next phase of the assignment.


十一点半,马丁收拾行李去往学习共享厅的另一处,媒体工作室,这里为学生提供若干工作站,用于更高级的音频视频工作。马丁和另外四个学生组成小组,要完成一份电影研究课程的功课。他们的任务是从一系列电影中找出表现具体电影拍摄技术的片段,并解释该效果为什么其作用。他们在小组工作台前回合,花了接下来的一个小时去审查影片,找出他们要用的片段。他们问值班的学生顾问,是合成一个单一片段好些还是分开存放好些。晚上零点四十五分,马丁及其队友做出自己的选择,并为下一阶段功课安排了任务。





Figure 8. Media Studio


图八、媒体工作室





Photo: Joe Mehling, Dartmouth College


摄影:达特茅斯学院,乔·美玲





Martin calls up a Web page that contains a form for reserving one of the small group study rooms. He and some classmates have made an arrangement to meet with their anthropology professor. This meeting is to check on the progress Martin's group is making with their research project. The group wants the professor to review the video clips on their project Web site. Having found the reservation form, Martin is relieved to find that a room is available for the time they need; he reserves it. Noting it is now nearly one in the morning, Martin decides to turn in early for once (he has a language drill session at 7:45 a.m.). While walking back to his dorm, Martin prepares for the drill session by listening to some language lab audio files, which are streamed from the language lab server to his wireless iPod II.


马丁打开一张网页,上面有一份表单,用来预约小型团队研究室。他和一些同学完成了人类学功课,准备去见教授。这次会面要检查马丁小组研究项目的工作的进度。小组希望教授审查他们项目网站上的视频片段。找到预约表单,马丁很高兴还有一间教室可以用,时间正合适。他预订了。注意到现在将近半夜一点钟,马丁一度决定尽早回去(早上七点四十五分有一门语言训练课)。在步行回宿舍的途中,马丁准备训练课程,听一些语音室的音频文件,这些是从语音室服务器上下载到他的无线iPod二代的。


New Learning Spaces


新的学习空间


These scenarios show Net Gen students and faculty engaged in learning practices that are leveraged by IT, a process that requires either improving current practices or creating new ones. The underlying theme remains the same, however: cultivating learning practices consistent with learning theory and aligned with the habits and expectations of Net Gen students (and soon professors!) who have been "raised on" IT. The scenarios suggest the importance of integrating all learning spaces, formal and informal. For most higher education institutions, the lecture hall will not disappear; the challenge is to develop a new generation of lecture hall, one that enables Net Gen students and faculty to engage in enlivened, more interactive experiences. If the lecture hall is integrated with other spaces—physically as well as virtually—it will enable participants to sustain the momentum from the class session into other learning contexts. The goal is not to do away with the traditional classroom, but rather to reinvent and to integrate it with the other learning spaces, moving toward a single learning environment.


这些场景显示了网络世代学生和教师如何参与有信息技术推动的学习实践,这一过程需要改善现有做法,或者创建新的做法。然而,底层基本主题都是相同的:培养与学习理论相一致的学习实践,并与网络世代学生的习惯、期待关联起来(很快就轮到教师了!)因为他们从小接受的就是信息技术的教育。这些场景展现了整合所有学习空间——正式和非正式——的重要性对大多数高等教育机构而言,演讲大厅并不会消失,困难在于发展出新一代的演讲大厅,可以让网络世代学生和教师积极参与、有更多互动体验的大厅。一旦这样的大厅与其他学习空间——物理的或虚拟的——结合起来,会让参与者将课堂上的劲头保持到其他学习环境。我们的目标并不是离开传统教室,而是改造传统教室并与其他学习空间集成,成为单一的学习环境。




Building on these scenarios, Table 2 illustrates how Net Gen characteristics (such as the proclivity for group work) and learning theory might be supported by learning space design and IT. Learning theory is central to any consideration of learning spaces; colleges and universities cannot afford to invest in "fads" tailored to the Net Gen student that might not meet the needs of the next generation.


通过建立这些场景,表二描述了学习空间设计和信息技术,是如何支持网络世代的特征(比如团队工作的倾向)和学习理论的。学习理论是构思所有学习空间的核心,高等院校不能致力于投资为迎合网络世代学生而产生的风潮,这些时尚并不会满足网络世代学生的需求。




For example, start with the Net Gen students' focus on goals and achievement. That achievement orientation ties to learning theory's emphasis on metacognition, where learners assess their progress and make active decisions to achieve learning goals. Learning space design could support this by providing contact with people who can provide feedback: tutors, consultants, and faculty. This could, in turn, be supported in the IT environment by making formative self-tests available, as well as an online portfolio, which would afford students the opportunity to assess their overall academic progress.


举例而言,一开始网络世代学生关注于目标和成就。而成就取向取决于学习理论对元认知的强化,因而学习者评估他们的学习过程,做出主动决断,实现学习目标。学习空间设计提供与可以给出反馈的人——导师、顾问和教师联系,来支持这种强化。相反,这也可以得到信息技术环境的支持,包括形成性自我测试,以及在线学习档案,后者可以为学生提供机会评估自己的整体学术进度。




Table 2. Aligning Net Gen Characteristics, Learning Principles, Learning Space, and IT Applications


表二、对比网络世代的特点、学习原则、学习空间、信息技术应用程序




































































Net Gen TraitLearning Theory PrinciplesLearning Space ApplicationIT Application
Group activityCollaborative, cooperative, supportiveSmall group work spacesIM chat; virtual whiteboards; screen sharing
Goal and achievement orientationMetacognition; formative assessmentAccess to tutors, consultants, and faculty in the learning spaceOnline formative quizzes; e-portfolios
MultitaskingActiveTable space for a variety of toolsWireless
Experimental; trial and errorMultiple learning pathsIntegrated lab facilitiesApplications for analysis and research
Heavy reliance on network accessMultiple learning resourcesIT highly integrated into all aspects of learning spacesIT infrastructure that fully supports learning space functions
Pragmatic and inductiveEncourage discoveryAvailability of labs, equipment, and access to primary resourcesAvailability of analysis and presentation applications
Ethnically diverseEngagement of preconceptionsAccessible facilitiesAccessible online resources
VisualEnvironmental factors; importance of culture and group aspects of learnersShared screens (either projector or LCD); availability of printingImage databases; media editing programs
InteractiveCompelling and challenging materialWorkgroup facilitation; access to expertsVariety of resources; no "one size fits all"

.































































网络世代特征学习理论原则学习空间应用信息技术应用
小组活动协作、合作、支持小型团队工作空间实时聊天、虚拟白板、屏幕共享
目标与成就导向元认知、形成性评价在学习空间会面导师、顾问和教师在线形成性小测验、电子学习档案
多任务能力积极可以摆放各种工具的桌面无线技术
体验、试错法多种学习途径整合实验设备用于分析研究的应用程序
完全信赖网络多种学习资源信息技术高度整合进学习空间的各个方面信息技术架构完全支持学习空间的所有功能
实用主义、归纳法鼓励发现提供实验室、设备,能够获取原始素材有分析与展示应用程序可用
人种多样性遭遇陈见设备的易用性在线资源的易用性
视觉化环境因素、学习者团队方面以及文化的重要性共享屏幕(投影仪或者液晶屏)、提供打印图像数据库、媒体编辑程序
互动吸引人的挑战性的材料促进团队化、会晤专家各种资源、没有一刀切





Perhaps the most challenging aspect of these new learning spaces is the need for integration. As institutions create an anywhere, anytime IT infrastructure, opportunities arise to tear down silos and replace them with a more ubiquitous learning environment. Using laptops and other networked devices, students and faculty are increasingly able to carry their entire working environment with them. To capitalize on this, campus organizations must work collaboratively to create a more integrated work environment for the students and faculty, one that better serves the mobile Net Gen students as well as a faculty faced with the initial influx of these students into their ranks. This will involve not only libraries and IT organizations but also facilities planning and buildings and grounds departments. Development organizations may also become involved as institutions look for the resources needed to implement these new learning spaces.


这些新学习空间最困难的地方,也许是整合。正如教育机构建立起随时随地的信息技术架构,在填平地窖的同时取而代之的是更加普遍的学习环境。使用笔电和其它网络设备,学生教师逐渐能够把整个工作环境都放在网上。为了充分利用这一点,学校各机构必须共同为师生创建更加集成化的工作环境,一个更好的服务于流动中的网络世代学生教师的工作环境。教师面临的是这些学生开始涌入教师队伍。这不仅涉及图书馆和信息技术部门,还包括设施规划、建筑、场地部门。随着教育机构为实施这些新的学习空间寻求资源,开发机构也可能会涉足其中。


Conclusion

结论


This description of learning spaces is suggestive rather than prescriptive. Learning spaces are complex, containing a multitude of variables. One of the key variables is the institution itself. Learning spaces are institutional in scope—their implementation involves the institution's culture, tradition, and mission. These institutional factors must be taken into account in order to design learning spaces to meet the needs of Net Gen students.


这些对学习空间的描述都是启发性的,不是强制性的。学习空间是复杂的,含有大量变数。关键变数之一是教育机构本身。学习空间属于机构的范畴——其实施涉及教育机构的文化、传统、职责。机构因素必须纳入考虑,才能设计出满足网络世代学生需求的学习空间。




We must remind ourselves that today's students are only the "first wave" to exhibit Net Gen characteristics. Soon they will be graduate students and assistant professors, bringing their Net Gen work habits to the faculty ranks. In addition, faculty who are baby boomers and Gen-Xers are acquiring Net Gen characteristics as they become more facile with—and dependent upon—IT. Planning for Net Gen requirements cannot be dismissed as catering to a single generation. IT and the work habits that IT encourages are here to stay; planning for the Net Generation is tantamount to planning for the future.


我们必须提醒自己,今天的学生仅仅是展示出网络世代特征的排头兵。他们很快就会成为研究生和助理教授,将其网络世代工作习惯带入教师队伍。另外,婴儿潮和里根世代的教室也正在获得网络世代特征,因为他们正变得更加适应——以及依赖——信息技术。为网络世代的需求所做的规划不能被斥为迎合这一代人。信息技术和鼓励使用信息技术的工作习惯一直都会有,为网络世代规划同样也是为未来规划。




No single magic formula will guarantee successful learning spaces on every campus. It is clear, however, that it will not be enough if we simply place projectors, computers, and DVD players in the classrooms. Nor will it be adequate just to provide scores of publicly available computers. Such tactics, in isolation, may have little impact. Learning space design is a large-scale, long-term project, involving building and maintaining consensus, curricular vision, emerging technology, and layout and furniture options, as well as intracampus organizational collaboration. Learning space design requires a collaborative, integrated approach, with an overarching vision that informs and supports specific projects.


没有一种神奇套路可以保证每一所学校的学习空间都能成功。然而,如果我们仅仅在教室里安装投影仪、计算机、DVD 播放器,显然是不够的。仅仅提供公用计算机也是不够的。这些孤立策略,并不会起多大作用。学习空间设计,是大型的、长期的项目,需要建立并保持共识、课程愿景、新兴技术、室内布局与家具选择,还有与校外机构的合作。学习空间设计需要共同的、综合的办法,一个可以激活和支持具体项目的整体目标。




The starting point for rethinking learning spaces to support Net Gen students begins with an underlying vision for the learning activities these spaces should support. This vision should be informed by learning theory, as well as by recognition of the characteristics of the students and faculty who use these spaces. An institution's specific culture, organizational structure, and fiscal circumstances enter the equation, as well. Once a vision has been established, the more concrete phases of planning can begin.


重新思考学习空间的切入点,是支持网络世代学生开始在这些学习空间进行一些基本的学习活动设想。这些基本设想应该依照于学习理论,并得到使用这些空间的师生的认可。教育机构的具体文化、组织结构、以及财务环境,也许要纳入考虑范围。一旦建立起设想,就可以开始规划更具体的阶段了。


Acknowledgments

致谢


The author would like to thank his friend and colleague, Joan Lippincott of the Coalition for Networked Information, for sharing insight and advice, as well as for her permission to use some of the ideas we articulated in our EDUCAUSE Quarterly article.


作者感谢他的朋友和同事,网络信息联盟的琼·李平科特,与他分享观点与意见,以及允许他使用一些在《EDUCAUSE季刊》文章中发表的思路。


Endnotes

尾注




  1. American Psychological Association, Board of Educational Affairs (BEA), "Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: A Framework for School Redesign and Reform," revision November 1997, http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp.html.


  2. National Research Council, How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice, M. Suzanne Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W. Pellegrino, eds. (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1999), pp. 12, 47; online edition available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9457.html.


Further Reading

扩展阅读


American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, and National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, "Powerful Partnerships: A Shared Responsibility for Learning" (June 1998), http://www.aahe.org/assessment/joint.htm.


美国高等教育协会,美国大学人事协会和全国学生人事管理人员协会,《强大的合作伙伴关系:学习共同责任》 (1998年6月)。




Robert B. Barr and John Tagg, "From Teaching to Learning—a New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education," in Learning from Change: Landmarks in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education from Change Magazine 1969–1999, Deborah DeZure, ed. (Sterling, Va.: Stylus Publishing, 2000), pp. 198–200. Originally published in Change, vol. 27, no. 6 (November/December 1995), pp. 12–25.


罗伯特·巴尔和约翰·塔格,《从教学对学生学习,本科教育新概念》,发表于《变化中的学习:1969至1999年杂志变化在高等教育教学与学习中的地标》,德博拉·德朱尔版本(弗吉尼亚州斯特林镇,铁笔出版社,2000年),第198-200页。最初发表于《变化》杂志第二十七卷第六期(一九九五年十一月十二月期),第12-25页。




Jacqueline Grennon Brooks and Martin G. Brooks, In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms (Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1993); online edition available at http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/1999brooks/1999brookstoc.html.


杰奎琳·格林侬·布鲁克斯和马丁·布鲁克斯,《搜索理解:建构课堂案例》(弗吉尼亚州亚历山大,监督与课程开发协会,1993年),在线版本:




Malcolm B. Brown and Joan K. Lippincott, "Learning Spaces: More than Meets the Eye," EDUCAUSE Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1 (2003), pp. 14–16, http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0312.pdf.


马尔科姆·布朗和琼·李平科特,《学习空间:远不止看到的东西》,《EDUCAUSE季刊》第二十六卷第一期(二〇〇三年),第14-16页。




Nancy Van Note Chism and Deborah J. Bickford, eds., The Importance of Physical Space in Creating Supportive Learning Environments: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 92 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002).


南希·范·笔记·奇兹姆和德博拉·比克福德合编,《创造支持性的学习环境中,物理空间的重要性:教学和学习的新方向》,第92号(旧金山:乔赛巴斯出版社,2002)。




National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, eds. (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2000), http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853.html.


国家研究委员会,《人们如何学习:大脑、心灵、经验,及学校:扩大版》,约翰·布兰斯福德、安·布朗和罗德尼·库金合编。(华盛顿特区:国家科学院出版社,2000年)。




Lennie Scott-Weber, In Sync: Environmental Behavior Research and the Design of Learning Spaces (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Society for College and University Planning, 2004), http://www.scup.org/pubs/books/is_ebrdls.html.


伦尼·斯科特-韦伯,《同步:环境行为研究与学习空间的设计》(密歇根州,安-雅博镇,高校规划协会,二〇〇四年)。


About the Author

关于作者


Malcolm Brown is director of academic computing at Dartmouth College. In this capacity he oversees IT support for teaching, learning, research, classroom technology, and media production. He has been active with the New Media Consortium (NMC), serving as chair of the NMC Board for 2003–2004, and is on the project board for the NMC Horizon Project for 2005. One of his areas of particular interest is learning theory and its application in the classroom. He has presented on these topics at the EDUCAUSE and National Learning Infrastructure Initiative (NLII) conferences and has participated in NLII focus sessions as well as Project Kaleidoscope's planning workshops for National Institute of Technology and Liberal Education (NITLE) schools. Brown has also taught courses on topics in intellectual history in the Jewish Studies program at Dartmouth.


马尔科姆·布朗,学术计算主任。在这个职位上,他负责为教学、学习、研究、教学技术和媒体制作提供信息技术支持。他一直积极参与新媒体协会(NMC),曾于二〇〇三至二〇〇四年担任新媒体协会理事会主席,二〇〇五年进入新媒体协会《地平线项目》项目理事会。特别感兴趣的领域之一是学习理论及其在课堂上的应用。他已经在EDUCAUSE和国家学习架构计划(NLII)会议提交了这些课题,并参加了NLII重点会议,以及为国家技术和博雅教育(NITLE)学校准备的万花筒项目的规划小组。布朗还在达特茅斯学院犹太研究项目中教授学术史方面课题的课程。




http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/LearningSpaces/6072


2009年10月16日星期五

翻译《11 为网络世代提升教师能力》

Faculty Development for the Net Generation


为网络世代提升教师能力



Anne H. Moore, John F. Moore, and Shelli B. Fowler

安妮·摩尔、约翰·摩尔、谢丽·福勒

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

弗吉尼亚理工学院和州立大学


© Anne Moore, John Moore, and Shelli Fowler

版权所有(C)安妮·摩尔、约翰·摩尔、谢丽·福勒


Introduction

简介


In the past 10 years, many colleges and universities have actively engaged in integrating technology in teaching and learning. Approaches to this integration are as varied as the institutions' missions and the clarity of their aims for technology-assisted instruction. Regardless of the approach, institutions must make the necessary human and financial investments. Faculty development for existing and future faculty is a pivotal investment for integrating technology in higher education; it can catalyze innovations in learning across generations.

过去十年,许多高校在教学中积极整合技术。整合的方法因各校教育目标而异,但其目的都是技术辅助教学。无论方法如何,教育机构都必须投入必要的人力和财力。要把技术整合进高等教育,现有教师的进修,以及培养未来教师,是关键性投资。这样做可以催化几代人之间的学习变革。


Today's students are described as busy instant messaging, blogging, downloading music and videos, and playing video games with an international network of friends and acquaintances. The technological engagement and interaction related to students' formal learning activities are not so widespread, however. Surveys of Net Generation students suggest that their learning experiences reflect mixed technology usage at best, and at worst they may experience ineffective or inappropriate uses of technology in their academic programs.1 Faculty report that students are asking for more online activities.2 A growing range of pilot programs and emerging practices document improvements in learning.3 But, when will such models be systematically adopted by institutions, resulting in widespread gains in student learning? That answer may be closely tied to faculty development.

今天的学生被描述成忙于实时通讯、写网志、下载音乐视频、和全球各地的朋友熟人玩电子游戏。然而,其中用到的技术和互动与学生的正规学习活动的关系并不很紧密。对网络世代学生的调查表明,他们的学习体验在最好的情况下能体现混合使用技术,在最坏的情况下,在其学术活动中能体验到无效的或者不当的技术用法。教师报告称,学生要求更多的在线活动。范围不断扩大的试点项目,新型的练习册,都在改善学习。但是,当教育机构系统的采用这种模式后,是否能让学生学习获得广泛收益?答案可能与教师发展紧密关联。


Defining what constitutes faculty development is an important first step. Expertise should be developed, not just in how to use technology or in pedagogical practice but also in how to understand learners and how they perceive technology.

厘清什么是教师发展,是很重要的第一步。发展专业知识,不仅要研究如何使用技术、如何用在教学实践当中,也要研究如何理解学习者、他们如何感受技术。


Jason Frand4 reinforced the need for faculty to work thoughtfully and creatively with Net Generation students' changing mindsets. Today's multitasking, Nintendo-born-and-bred students do not view computers as technology. They have a range of attributes that distinguish them from older generations. Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers populate higher education's existing faculty ranks; they have different mindsets. In order for higher education to ensure that productive teaching and learning exchanges occur across generations of learners, these different mindsets may need to be reconciled. As we've designed faculty development at Virginia Tech, the following characteristics of the Net Generation have influenced our programs.

贾森·弗伦德强调,教师要周道又有创意的与网络世代学生一起工作,就需要改变思维模式。今天伴随着多任务和任天堂成长起来的学生,并不把计算机当成技术。他们有很多特点与老一辈不同。婴儿潮和里根世代占据了高等教育现有教师队伍。他们有着不同的思维模式。为了确保高等教育不同世代学习者之间产生教学交流,需要协调这些不同的思维模式。正如我们在弗吉尼亚理工大学设计的教师发展,网络世代的以下特征影响着我们的项目:


  • Life online. For several decades, a growing body of research points to the ways in which computers and related technologies influence the ways we live and work—indeed, the way we think.5 Sherry Turkle6 has also studied the effects of computers on children and adolescents, describing the manner in which online environments offer spaces for identity, play, and expressing multiple aspects of the self. The so-called loner or silent student who might have never spoken in a face-to-face learning environment today may have online companions and also may interact more readily in online learning activities.
  • 网络化生活。几十年来,越来越多的研究支出,计算机及相关技术影响着我们生活工作方式——事实上,是对我们思维方式。雪利·特克尔还研究了计算机对儿童和青少年的影响,称影响集中在网上环境为身份、游戏、表达自我的多个方面提供空间。今天所谓不合群、安静的学生,可能在面对面学习环境中从不开口说话,但却有网上伙伴,也更容易在网上学习活动中发生互动。

  • Rapid communication. Turkle's research suggests that word processing has made thinking with our hands commonplace, for it allows people to quickly display their thoughts—good and bad, organized or chaotic—on a page. The resulting communications, public and private, often demonstrate wide variations in quality of thought and writing style; current experience in online education bears this out as well.
  • 快速沟通。特克尔的研究表明,字处理让我们用手思考变得稀松平常,让人们在纸上快速展现自己的想法,无论好坏、有无条理。由此产生的沟通,无论公开或私下的,常常在思想素质和写作风格上表现出巨大的差异。目前的网络教育也证实了这一点。

  • Social networking. The Net Generation uses technology to enliven and extend their social networks. Reports of Weblog use in higher education indicate that blogs are "helping students across the country meet their dorm mates, form study groups, and make friends before they set foot on … campus."7a,b
  • 社会网络。网络世代使用技术为其社交网络增添活力、扩展社交网络。高等教育中网志的使用报告表明,网志“帮助全国各地的学生,走进大学校园之前就开始寻找舍友,形成学习小组,结交朋友。”

  • Games and simulations. Net Generation students cut their teeth on computer games and simulations. This may have profound effects for learning. Fortunately for educators, games and simulations can be used to provide beneficial insights on simple or complex phenomena. Yet, life tends not to play out solely through the logic or binary rules of games and simulations; students' learning today needs to be more than simulacra.
  • 游戏与虚拟。网络世代学生从计算机游戏和模拟器中获得经验。这可能对学习产生深远影响。幸运的是,对于教育者,游戏和模拟器可以用来对简单或复杂现象提供有益的见解。然而,通过游戏和模拟器的逻辑或二元规则,往往并不能完全解决生活问题,今天学生的学习需要比想象更多的东西。

  • Digital literacy. Just as word processing makes it physically easier for students to express themselves, computers make it possible to use many applications, from spreadsheets to databases, without knowing how the hardware or software works. Turkle claimed that today's college students are so used to thinking about things at "interface" value, clicking on icons to accomplish their work and play, that all they require is seeing how something works rather than knowing how it works. Although the Net Generation is considered digitally literate, they might not possess the full complement of the knowledge and skills they need to use technology wisely and well. The same may be true for faculty.
  • 数字化素养。正如字处理可以让学生更容易表达自我,计算机可以使用很多应用程序,从电子表格到数据库,不需要知道硬软件是如何工作的。特克尔称,现在的大学生习惯于把事物看作“接口”,点击图标,完成工作,进行游戏,他们需要的仅仅是看见事物在工作,而不是了解如何工作。尽管都认为网络世代具备数字化素养,但是他们可能并不具备完整的知识和技能,而他们恰恰需要广泛而良好的运用这些技术。对于教师也同样如此。

Fluency in Information Technology

流畅使用信息技术


The National Research Council concluded that fluency with information technology is imperative today. This state of mind is called FIT, for fluency in information technology.8a,b FITness requires three kinds of knowledge:

全国研究理事会断言,今天必须掌握流畅的信息技术能力。这种状态称之为“适应”,即流畅使用信息技术。达到适应状态需要三大类知识:


  • Contemporary skills—the ability to use today's computer applications, enabling people to apply information technology immediately. Skills are an essential component of job readiness. Most importantly, skills provide a store of practical experience on which to build new competence.
  • 现代技术能力——使用现在的计算机应用程序的能力,可以让人们快速运用信息技术。技能是就业准备的重要组成部分。最重要的是,技能为产生新的能力提供了具体经验基础。

  • Foundational concepts—the basic principles and ideas of computers, networks, and information that underpin the technology. Concepts explain the how and why of information technology, and they give insight into its opportunities and limitations. Concepts are the raw material for understanding IT as it evolves.
  • 基本概念——计算机、网络的基本原理和概念,以及技术背后的信息。解释信息技术原理和原因的知识,以及对机会和局限的深刻理解。随着技术的进步,这些概念是理解信息技术的原材料。

  • Intellectual capabilities—the ability to apply information technology in complex situations, encapsulating higher-level thinking in the context of IT. These capabilities empower people to manipulate the medium to their advantage and to handle unintended and unexpected problems when they arise. Intellectual capabilities foster more abstract thinking about information and its manipulation.
  • 智力能力——在复杂情况下应用信息技术的能力,在信息技术背景下总结出更高层次的思维。这些能力使得人们有能力操纵媒介的优势,发生意外问题时有能力处理。智力能力促使更抽象的思考信息及相关处理方式。

To help students gain the knowledge necessary for FITness, an institution's strategic plan and teaching and learning activities should contain appropriate goals for becoming FIT. Faculty and staff who do not have the requisite knowledge and skills to work toward fluency in information technology may need professional development programs that help them achieve FITness in their teaching and research. To bridge the gap between faculty expertise and student needs, institutions must address awareness, enablement, and integration:

为了帮助学生获得必要的知识,达到适应状态,教育机构的政策计划和教学活动,应该包含达到适应状态相应的目标。不具备必要的知识和技能的教师和员工,应当致力于流畅运用信息技术,为了达到这一点,可能需要专业发展计划,帮助他们在教学研究中实现适应状态。为了弥补教师专业技术和学生需求之间的差距,教育机构必须解决知晓、实现和集成三个问题:


  • Awareness of students' approaches to meeting their learning needs and of what technologies are available to them
  • 知晓学生实现自己学习需求的方法,知道需要为他们提供哪些技术

  • Enablement through professional development so they have the skills needed to implement systemic change
  • 通过专业发展得以实现,这样他们拥有实施系统化变革所需要的技能

  • Integration, or the ability to bring together the disparate pieces needed—pedagogy, learning space design, technology, support, policies—to enable successful learning
  • 集成,将所需不同部分——教学法、学习环境设计、技术、支持、政策——整合在一起,实现成功学习的能力

Because technology, pedagogy, and practice change so rapidly, faculty professional development may need to be ongoing. When IT is involved, institutions also need to provide easy and convenient support for technology-integrated learning. To leverage the creativity of faculty and staff—to turn their intellectual and social imaginations to the task—institutions need to provide systematic encouragement and assistance through comprehensive faculty development programs.

因为技术、教学法和具体实践的变化是如此之快,以至于教师专业发展可能需要不断进行。一旦涉及信息技术,教育机构还需要为整合技术的学习提供简单便利的支持。为了充分利用教师和员工的创造性,将其智慧和社会想像力用在工作上,教育机构需要通过全面的教师发展规划,提供系统化的鼓励和协助。


The remainder of this chapter will describe two programs at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University that focus on professional development: for faculty, the Faculty Development Institute (FDI); and for graduate students, the Graduate Education Development Institute (GEDI). Both programs are grappling with ways to engage Net Generation students to benefit their learning.

本章其余部分将描述弗吉尼亚理工学院和弗吉尼亚州立大学两个专业发展的项目:一个面向教师,教师发展学会(FDI),一个面向研究生,研究生发展学会(GEDI)。这两个项目都致力于让网络世代学生从学习中受益。


The Faculty Development Institute

教师发展学会


Virginia Tech's Faculty Development Institute helps faculty acquire teaching strategies that leverage instructional technologies to improve student learning (http://www.fdi.vt.edu/). FDI is the cornerstone of a large-scale, continuing strategy to systematically promote innovative, informed uses of technology in daily practice for faculty and students. FDI also represents one institution's attempt to focus on the knowledge and skills development required for a FIT faculty in order to meet today's students' needs for fluency in using information technology, or FITness. Begun in 1993, FDI

弗吉尼亚理工学院的教师发展学会帮助教师掌握教学策略,充分运用学校技术改善学生学习。该学会是有系统的促进教师和学生在日常实践中灵活而创造性使用技术的大范围持续政策基础。该学会也代表了教育机构关注知识和技能发展的意图,这种发展是教师满足今日学生需求的流畅使用信息技术——或者说,适应状态——所必需的。从一九九三年开始,该学会


  • offers a recurring four-year cycle of faculty development workshops,
  • 提供为期四年的教师发展研讨会,

  • links professional development to replacing faculty computers every four years,
  • 每隔四年,随着专业发展更换教师计算机,

  • supports course development initiatives,
  • 支持课程开发活动,

  • promotes student digital literacy, and
  • 促进学生数字化素养,以及

  • outfits classrooms with appropriate technology.
  • 为班级配备适当的技术。

As a result, Net Generation students today are likely to find that a majority of their courses involve blended face-to-face and online learning activities, online discussions, archived learning materials, and discipline-specific software and Web-accessed resources—aspects of learning they claim to fully appreciate. And as these Net Gen students clamor for more, faculty report that their repeated FDI participation has made them likely to use technology more effectively across the spectrum of their professional lives, including teaching, research, and service roles.

这样一来,今天的网络世代学生可能会发现,他们的大多数课程同时包含有面对面和在线学习活动、在线讨论、存档学习资料、特定学科软件、网络资源,他们宣称学习的各个方面均获益。并且随着这些网络世代学生的要求越来越多,教师报告说,他们反复参加教师发展学会,让他们在自己学术生涯的方方面面更高效利用技术,包括教学、研究和服务工作。


Early FDI programs focused more on lowering faculty anxieties related to using new technologies in teaching. In the early 1990s, students were not always comfortable with changes in teaching or learning practices that technology introduced. Some students and faculty questioned whether the new technologies were just passing fads. But after the successes of the first full FDI cycle and with growing technology use plainly evident across a spectrum of institutional life, the university's 1996 strategic plan established the faculty development process as a strategic objective. Acknowledging that institutional leadership at the highest levels was necessary to sustain widespread technology integration, the 1996 plan and one in 2002 outlined aims for FITness. With strategic objectives and the requisite support structures in place, the university sought not only to provide for grassroots experimentation and innovation but also to nurture the seeds of change for faculty and students, regardless of generational affiliation.

早期的教师发展学会着重于降低教师在教学中使用新技术时候的焦虑。九十年代早期,学生并不总是适应在教育学习当中引入技术。一部分师生质疑新技术是否仅仅一时风潮。但是首轮教师发展学会成功完成之后,在教学工作的方方面面使用技术越来越多。学校一九九六年工作计划把教师发展进程确定为战略目标。一九九六年计划和二〇〇二年概要目标为了达到适应状态,确定了学校高层领导是普及技术集成的必要支撑。由于确定了战略目标和必要的支持结构,大学不仅需要提供基础实验和革新,还需要为师生做出改变培养种子,无论这些师生属于哪一代人。


Repeated participation of virtually all faculty (96 percent) and all department heads over more than a decade of FDI programs has helped build a wider familiarity and understanding of the complex issues involved in adopting and successfully integrating technology in traditional and hybrid courses. Awareness of the challenges raised in fully online distance-learning programs has increased as well. In addition, the evolving expectations of successive generations of students (of which Net Generation students are the latest and perhaps most vocal about technology's place in their lives) surface in faculty narratives shared in FDI workshops about successful strategies and practices. In turn, informal peer-mentoring activities have proven particularly productive in helping faculty address specific concerns. An especially effective feature of FDI is the series of presentations by faculty demonstrating how and why they have changed their approaches to teaching. These presentations provide credible responses to questions about the effects of technology use on student learning and attitude, productivity, student-faculty communication, instructional development time, and more.

几乎所有教师(96%)和全部部门领导都反复参加超过十年的教师发展学会,这样做帮助他们更加熟悉和理解如何在复杂环境中使用技术,并成功将技术集成到传统课程和混合课程当中。认识到完全在线远程学习项目带来的挑战也在不断增多。此外,在教师发展学会研讨会上分享的有关成功策略和实践故事中,披露出一代代学生的要求不断发展(网络世代学生是最新一代,也许是谈及技术在自己生活中的位置时谈得最多的)。反过来,非正式的同伴辅导活动,经证实在帮助教师解决特定问题时特别有效。教师发展学会一个特别有用的特征,是教师展示他们改变其教学方法的理由和方式的一系列演讲。面对为学生学习、态度、生产力、师生沟通、教学开发时间以及其他场合,使用技术的质疑,这些演讲提供了可信的答复。


Since its inception FDI has sought to involve faculty as workshop presenters on as many topics as feasible. Not surprisingly, the credibility and practicality evaluations of these presenters are high. Faculty selected to present to their peers are able to clearly describe successes and failures of early adoption strategies with emerging technologies in the context of their personal interaction with students. For example, presenters might illuminate how the use of instant messaging within a course fits with current expectations, habits, and practices of Net Generation students, as well as how it might benefit learning. FDI extends this approach to helping faculty understand changing norms and expectations in their use of course management systems, collaboration and conferencing tools, e-portfolios, digital library resources, and similar learning assets.

教师发展学会自成立以来,就在尽可能多的课题邀请教师担任研讨会主讲人。毫不奇怪,这些主讲人的可靠性和实用性评估都很高。教师选择向其伙伴展示,能够清晰的描述早期在运用与学生的个人互动环境中新出现的技术策略的成功和失败。比如,主讲人会说明如何在课程中使用实时通讯,以迎合当前网络世代学生的期望、习惯、实践,以及这是如何是学习受益的。教师发展学会用演讲这种方法来帮助教师理解,在使用课程管理系统、协作与会议工具、电子学习档案、数码图书馆资源以及类似学习设施的时候,要求和标准的变化。


Further, faculty indicate that they find equal or greater value in systematic assistance from their peers. Such assistance includes sorting out ways in which new techniques or procedures relate to possible changes in course goals and outcomes, the incorporation of interdisciplinary agendas, and the introduction of gaming and simulation strategies to stretch and deepen learning. Faculty presentations, case studies, and Webcasts provide examples and personal narratives about successful (and problematic) implementations of emerging strategies to interested workshop participants.

此外,教师表示,他们发现来自同伴的系统化帮助,能带来同样或更大的价值。这些帮助包括挑选出与课程目标及成果改变相关的新技术、新流程,跨学科合作议程,为延伸和深化学习引入游戏与模拟策略。教师演讲、案例研究、网上广播,为有兴趣的研讨会成员提供了应用新策略成功(失败)的范例和个人故事。


FDI encourages interaction among presenters and other faculty. Resources and contact information are provided for each program track on its Web site.9 Modeled much like an online course, these faculty-to-faculty queries and conversations can be extended after workshops through online forums or e-mail with presenters. If developing course materials outside scheduled workshops is necessary, FDI provides production resources for digitizing content (for example, slides, audio, video) or limited quantities of graphic or animation developed through its partnership with the university's New Media Center (http://www.nmc.vt.edu).

教师发展学会鼓励演讲人和其他教师进行互动。在其网站上可以随时查阅每个项目提供的资源和联络信息。其网站模式很像在线课程,教师之间的提问与交流,可以在研讨会结束后,通过在线论坛和电子邮件,与演讲人做进一步交流。如果有必要需要开发研讨会计划之外的课程素材,教师发展学会可以为数字化内容提供生产资源(比如幻灯片、音频、视频)或者与该大学新媒体中心合作开发的数量有限的图片、动画。


As mentioned earlier, evaluation of the workshops by faculty attendees is positive. During a workshop, evaluations are conducted every 90 minutes using a Web-based form, providing rapid reports to workshop facilitators who, in turn, make changes expeditiously. Faculty clearly value the opportunity to explore instructional issues with their colleagues and to discover the potential of technology for enhancing their teaching; and they have indicated that FDI resources are critical if they are to adapt to the needs of their students. Indeed, faculty cite increased pressure from Net Generation students for more sophisticated uses of current and emerging technologies; these students say there is more to innovative teaching than PowerPoint and Excel.

如前所述,对教师参与的研讨会的评价是积极的。在研讨会期间,每九十分钟,就通过网页表单进行一次评价,为研讨会主持人提供快速报告,相应的,他也做出快速变化。教师很清楚与同事一起探究教学问题、发现技术在增强教学的潜力,这一机会的价值。他们也表示,教师发展学会的资源很重要,因为能满足他们学生的需求。事实上,教师举例来自网络世代学生的不断增加的压力,促使他们使用更复杂的当前新技术,学生表示,有很多比演示文稿和电子表格更加先进的教学技术。


Over a dozen years, FDI programs have evolved in several important ways. The content of FDI workshops changes each year as new technologies emerge and faculty demonstrate improved approaches to using technology in instruction. Early programs focused more on the basics of using technology and software. Current programming places more emphasis on

十几年来,教师发展学会项目在许多重大方面发生了变化。研讨会的内容每年都在变化,因为每年都有新技术出现,教师展示了在教学中使用技术的更好的方法。早期项目更关注于使用技术和软件的基础知识。现在的项目把更多重点


  • Shifts in faculty perceptions of students' expectations
  • 转移到教师对学生期望的认知上

  • Students' use of technologies such as instant messaging and blogs
  • 放在学生对技术的使用上,比如实时通讯和网志

  • Teaching strategies that can successfully address such behavioral shifts
  • 放在可以成功解决这类行为变化的教学策略上

  • Ways to design for active learning
  • 放在主动学习的设计方法上

  • The appropriate means for dealing with a range of privacy and security issues
  • 放在处理各种隐私和安全问题的适当方法上

Many workshops have also featured strategic, discipline-specific software with which faculty have requested assistance, such as MATLAB (math software used in engineering, science, and business), AutoCAD (design software used in architecture and engineering), ESRI Geographic Information Systems (GIS software used in agriculture, engineering, science, and social science), LabVIEW (instrumentation software used in agriculture, engineering, and science), and others. All workshops include open lab time designed to give faculty opportunities to apply what they learn to their courses. FDI staff also encourage faculty to bring their graduate assistants to workshops to facilitate the incorporation of new methodologies and technologies into the future professoriate's teaching practices.

许多研讨会也为那些请求援助的教师提供学科相关的重要软件,比如MATLAB(数学软件,用于工程、科学、商业)、AutoCAD(设计软件,用于建筑与工程)、ESRI 地理信息系统(用于农业、工程、科学、社会科学)、LabView(仪器软件,用于农业、工程、科学)以及其他。所有研讨会都包含上机时间,旨在为教师提供应用所学的机会。教师发展学会员工还鼓励教师带上助教参加研讨会,以促使新技术新方法融合进将来的专业教学实践中。


Other changes in programming include immersing faculty in more online activities that might lead to creating learning environments similar to their students' personal communication environments. A workshop might include an online tutorial, a short streaming video segment, and an online chat or discussion. The overall context emphasizes how technology-based resources may be useful to students in the learning; in the background, the hands-on use of software and Web-based tools such as course management systems or e-portfolios provides opportunities to practice.

规划中的其他改变包括让教师沉浸在更多在线活动中,这可以让教师创造类似于他们学生的个人通讯环境的学习环境。研讨会还包括在线教程,流视频片段,在线谈话及讨论。整体环境强调技术资源如何用于学生学习,在后台,现成的软件和网页工具,比如课程管理系统、电子学习档案,为实践提供了机会。


A third shift has involved recognizing that FDI, while beginning as a teaching/learning enhancement program, should enlarge its scope to directly address how information technologies can be useful in all aspects of faculty life. Indeed, FDI staff work hard to maintain programming relevance and value. The identification of new topics and issues often comes directly from faculty through program evaluations, internal grant proposals, consultations, and direct suggestions. In addition, staff hold periodic program-planning briefings with each college to gather feedback on current offerings and to gain faculty input on topics that should be addressed in the future. Examples of new topics introduced based on faculty suggestions include Creating Learning-Centered Instruction, Parallel Programming for Supercomputing, and Using LabVIEW to Enhance Laboratory Learning. Other workshops and support for technology-assisted or enhanced research collaboration, grant writing, and presentation of research findings also resulted directly from faculty requests.

第三个改变牵涉到对教师发展学会的认可,虽然一开始是教育学习发展项目,意图扩大其作用范围,直接解决信息技术如何用在教师生活方方面面。事实上,教师发展学会员工很努力保持项目的意义和价值。要确认来自教师的新课题和问题,就要通过项目评估、内部许可提案、评议会、直接建议。另外,员工定期为每个学院发布项目规划简报,并收集对当前服务的反馈,得到教师对课题的看法,并在未来加以解决。基于教师建议开设新的课题介绍范例,包括创建以学习为中心的教学法,超级计算机并行程序设计,使用 LabView 增强实验学习。计算机辅助或增强协作研究、授予写作、展示研究成果,等其他研讨会及技术支持,也都直接来自于教师建议。


Another aspect of maintaining FDI relevance and value involves providing just-in-time, need-to-know access to information. FDI provides several Web-based information resources. An instructional design portal provides in-depth information, examples, and Web references covering instructional design models, pedagogy and learning theories, teaching strategies, media selection methodologies, and guidance on evaluation and assessment.10 For those with immediate questions concerning software functions and operations, FDI licenses online tutorials from Element K and Atomic Learning.11a,b Because the tutorial is well indexed, it is also easy to search when looking for specific information, such as how to insert graphs into documents. Thus the tutorial can also serve as an on-demand reference or help tool.

另一方面,维持教师发展学会的意义和价值,需要提供及时的公开的信息访问。教师发展学会提供许多网页信息资源。教学设计门户网站提供深入信息、示例和网络参考文献,内容覆盖教学设计模式、教育学和学习理论、教学策略、媒体选择方法论、评价与评估指南。针对这些与软件功能和操作有关的实时提问,教师发展学会允许在线辅导资料从钾元素到学习原子。由于这种辅导资料有着良好的索引,因此在需要寻找特定信息的时候很方便搜索,比如如何向文档中插入图形。因而这种辅导资料也可以作为一种围绕需求产生的参考文献或者帮助工具。


While faculty may refer to these resources for their own use, they also frequently treat the tutorials as supplements or references for students. Some faculty assign tutorials to be used outside class, saving valuable face-to-face time for other topics. Hundreds of tutorials are available and marketed alongside face-to-face workshops to emphasize continual availability. Faculty and students expect such immediate access—a characteristic of the Net Generation.

虽然教师可以自己引用这些资源,但他们也经常把这些辅导资料当作学生的补充和参考文献。一些教师设计课堂之外使用的辅导材料,为其他课题节省宝贵的面谈时间。有数以百计的辅导资料可用,依靠面对面的研讨会进行推广,强调可持续性。教师和学生期望这样的直接访问——网络世代的特点。


Carefully coordinated faculty development programs are a critical component of teaching and learning improvement. But these efforts are not stand-alone initiatives; they must be linked to infrastructure and services. For example, holistic planning is a necessity when curricular changes occur that require long-term planning for upgrades of discipline-specific computer classrooms and development of new courseware by faculty. Likewise, planning for workshops related to effective uses of wireless Internet access in classrooms should be coordinated with campus network planning efforts so that faculty are ready to leverage such an asset as soon as it is operational.

认真协调教师发展项目,是改善教育学习这一工作很重要的一部分。但是这些努力并不是孤立的行为,他们必须与基础设施及服务关联起来。比如,当课程发生变化,就需要整体规划,规划更新具体学科计算机教室的整个学期的安排,以及教师开发新的课件。同样,研讨会与有效使用无线互联网接入访问教室的规划,应该与校园网络规划工作协调好,这样教师为使用这些设施做好准备,一来就可以用。


Virginia Tech, like many institutions, offers an array of services on behalf of technology-assisted learning that are closely aligned with the supporting infrastructure. Presenting a comprehensive, cohesive view of the breadth and depth of development services and programs is useful; old-fashioned marketing helps. Strategies aimed at better cohesion and communication include coordinating institutional offerings, cosponsoring and cobranding presentations, workshops, and lecture series, as well as internal grant programs and course development assets. Because different development programs and agencies within an institution often attract different segments of university faculty and staff, joint marketing and sponsorship can broaden the awareness and impact of each unit's work while simultaneously amplifying communication of institutional aims. In addition, Virginia Tech constructed Torgersen Hall, a building designed to showcase university activities for integrating technology in teaching and research as well as to provide spaces where such efforts might come together more spontaneously. Torgersen Hall also provides a home for FDI, the New Media Center, the digital library research, and more.

弗吉尼亚理工大学,和其他教育机构一样,提供了一系列可以帮助用技术辅助学习的服务,这些服务与配套设施高度一致。提出一项既全面又内聚的观点,关于发展服务和项目的广度和深度都是有用的,老式的市场营销帮助。针对更好地团结与沟通的策略,包括协调机构服务、共同赞助及联合署名演讲、研讨会、系列讲座,以及国内捐款项目和课程开发设备。因为教育机构内不同的开发项目和部门,常常吸引不同的大学教师学生群体,共同营销及赞助可以拓宽认知和每个单元工作的影响力,同时放大教育机构目标的沟通。另外,弗吉尼亚理工大学修建了托格森大厅,意在陈列大学把技术集成进教学和研究的活动,以及提供场所让这些工作能够更自发的走到一起。托格森大厅也为教师发展学会、新媒体中心、数字化图书馆研究,等提供办公场所。


Click here to access videos of Torgersen Hall.

点击此处访问托格森大厅相关视频。


In summary, the FDI aims to help faculty construct a personal linkage between their professional needs in teaching and research as well as with the Net Generation and emerging technologies. Such development programs should emphasize teaching, learning, curriculum, discovery, and the needs of faculty and students; they should not focus on technology for its own sake. This focus underlies FDI's long-term, strategic value to the faculty and the university, which faculty and students have confirmed in surveys. Survey respondents indicate that active learning is integrated into instruction; greater student collaboration is taking place; and communication between faculty and students is enhanced. More important, perhaps, the surveys suggest that students feel they have a better understanding of course materials. Plus, they believe that they are provided opportunities to develop skills—such as problem-solving and critical thinking—that transcend individual subjects.

总之,教师发展学会旨在帮助教师,在其专业教学研究需求,和网络世代与新技术之间,构建个人联系。这一发展计划应强调教学、学习、课程、探索、师生需求,不应该把技术当成目标。这种强调构成了教师发展学会为学校和教师定下的长期战略价值,这已通过调查为师生所证实。调查对象表示,教学中已经集成有积极学习,正在发生更大程度的学生合作,师生之间的交流得到加强。或许更重要的是,调查表明,学生觉得他们对教材有了更好的理解。此外,他们相信他们获得机会发展大都科目所不能得到的技能,比如问题解决和批判性思考。


The Graduate Education Development Institute

研究生教育发展学会


Building on the success of the Faculty Development Institute, Virginia Tech launched a pilot project in 2003. Working in collaboration with the Graduate School, Learning Technologies (the division of Information Technology at Virginia Tech that also houses FDI) created the Graduate Education Development Institute (GEDI) to engage future faculty in teaching, learning, and technology issues as an integral part of their graduate student professional development. According to the EDUCAUSE Current Issues Committee, the "rapid introduction of new technologies and the constant enhancements and upgrades to existing technologies" indicates that faculty development models that focus on continuous learning and that take a systemic approach are increasingly necessary.12 With the creation of GEDI, Virginia Tech is moving toward a systemic approach that addresses current faculty (in FDI) and that engages our future faculty (in GEDI). While we encourage faculty-to-graduate-student mentoring, GEDI also recognizes the importance of peer mentoring in the process of learning to teach effectively. To that end, GEDI serves as a multidisciplinary site where graduate students can explore the integration of teaching, learning, and technology that meets the needs of Net Generation learners and their own professional needs for FITness.

在教师发展学会的基础上,弗吉尼亚理工大学于二〇〇三年启动了一项试点项目。与研究生院合作开展学习技术研究(在弗吉尼亚理工大学,研究信息技术的部门还有教师发展学会),建立研究生教育发展学会(GEDI),鼓励未来教师将教育、学习、技术问题当作其研究生专业发展不可分割的一部分。据EDUCAUSE 当前问题委员会所述,“新技术的快速引入,以及对已有技术的不断更新换代”,表明强调不断学习、采取系统方法进行学习这种教师发展模式,日益必要。随着研究生教育发展学会的建立,弗吉尼亚理工大学正开始通过系统方法对待当前的(教师发展学会里的)教师、吸引我们未来的(研究生教育发展学会里的)教师。虽然我们鼓励教师辅导研究生,但是研究生教育发展学会也认可学习过程中,同伴辅导对有效教学的重要性。为此,研究生教育发展学会建立一座多学科网站,让研究生探究教育、学习与技术的集成,满足网络世代学习者的需求,以及他们自己为达到适应性而产生的专业需求。


GEDI invites future faculty, at the beginning of their teaching careers, to begin thinking about how they can best communicate with Net Generation students. In doing so, GEDI staff hope to facilitate the development of a reflective teaching practice that better enables 21st-century faculty to recognize the importance of continuous learning for themselves as well as their students.

研究生教育发展学会鼓励未来教师,在其教师生涯一开始,就开始思考他们怎样才能与网络世代学生无障碍沟通。在这情况下,研究生教育发展学会员工希望促进进一步反思教学手段,让新世纪教师更好的认识到,他们自身,以及他们的学生不断学习的重要性。


Click here to access video clips of GEDI participants.

点击此处访问研究生教育发展学会参与者相关视频。


In many ways, professional development issues are as old as academe itself. Yet the future professoriate is facing a new academy, one which asks them to envision "new structures and funding models, new professionals, new relationships, new accountability, and new leadership roles."13a,b For graduate students who plan to remain in academe, the 21st-century university is an exciting place. Even as novice teachers and scholars, many are eager to critically analyze the kinds of teaching and mentoring practices that have—and have not—worked well. The majority of graduate students in GEDI are a mix of late Baby Boomers and Generation Xers; almost all of these young professionals are technologically savvy in ways that their senior professors are not. As such, GEDI participants are curious about how the Net Generation's learning processes may differ from their own; they are intent on becoming teachers with skills that engage Net Generation learners.

在许多方面,专业发展问题跟学术界一样古老。然而,未来的教授将要面临全新的大学,要求他们想像“新的结构和资金模式、新的专业人才、新的关系、新的责任、新的领导工作”。对于打算留在学术界的研究生,二十一世纪的大学是一个令人激动的地方。即使是新进的教师和学者,许多都热衷于以批判的眼光,分析这类教学和辅导策略,行之有效或无效的方法。研究生教育发展学会中的研究生大部分都是婴儿潮后期和里根世代。这些年轻的专业人才几乎所有都掌握他们年长教授不懂的技术。这样一来,研究生教育发展学会参与者都很好奇,网络世代的学习过程与他们自己的有哪些不同,他们专注于成为懂技术的、能够吸引网络世代学习者的教师。


Still in a pilot phase, the primary focus of GEDI is a semester-long, for-credit, multidisciplinary seminar, "Pedagogical Practices in Contemporary Contexts." This course asks participants to explore (and begin to develop) the kinds of reflective pedagogical practices that stimulate 21st-century lifelong learning and engagement within the Net Generation. (The course is also part of a recently approved Future Professoriate graduate certificate that students may choose to earn.) The intent of the GEDI pilot project is to move beyond the unavoidable limitations of short-term, workshop-based training. GEDI staff work to create an interactive community over the span of a semester. This community crosses disciplinary lines, offering the potential for multidisciplinary collaboration and opportunities to "think outside the box" of discipline-specific perspectives. This process begins by discussing the importance of having pedagogical practices informed by pedagogical theory. In many disciplines there is little organized discussion of teaching methods, and rarely is there assigned reading in any pedagogical theory that might inform practice. (Colleges and schools of education, as well as some disciplines within the humanities, are notable exceptions.)

目前仍然处在试验阶段,研究生教育发展学会重点关注为期一学期的、计算学分的多学科研讨会,“当代环境下的教学方式”。该课程要求参与者探究(同时开始发展)能够激励二十一世纪终身学习、促进网络世代参与其中的各类反思型教学方法。(该课程也是最近批准的未来教授学位证书的一部分,允许学生选修。)研究生教育发展学会试验项目的意图在于,超越短期研讨班训练不可避免的局限性。研究生教育发展学会员工的工作建立起了为期一个学期的互动社区。该社区跨越众多学科,提供了多学科合作的潜力,为具体学科看法提供了“走出局限思维”的机会。这一过程首先讨论通过教学理论了解教学实践的重要性。许多学科很少组织讨论教学方法。(教育院校,以及一些人文学科,显然例外)。


In the first part of the GEDI course, students look at the potential usefulness of a critical pedagogical praxis. In particular, participants examine ways in which critical pedagogy may inform teaching practices with the goal of helping students think about their own learning processes. For example, seminar participants read selected works and discuss ways in which theory and practice might be reinvented and reframed for their own discipline. GEDI participants are encouraged to read other pedagogical theory as well. Emphasis is placed on thinking about pedagogical practices in terms of the learning objectives each instructor is trying to achieve, not on a specific theoretical approach. This process is increasingly important as participants learn to recognize the ways in which Net Generation students differ from their predecessors and the ways in which learning to be FIT might successfully occur.

在研究生教育发展学会课程的最开始,学生考虑一项关键教学实践的潜在效用。特别是,参与者探讨在帮助学生思考自身学习过程之一目标之下,这一批判式教学法会影响教学实践的哪些方面。比如,研讨会与会者阅读选出文章,讨论在自身学科当中的哪些方面,重复发明、构造了这些理论和实践活动。研究生教育发展学会鼓励参与者也阅读其他教学法理论。重点放在对教学实践的思考上,要从每位教育者力求实现的学习目标方面进行思考,而非具体的理论方法。随着参与者学习认识到,网络世代学生与其前辈的不同,以及学习达到适应状态的方法有可能成功,该过程越发重要。


Regardless of the domain knowledge being taught, traditional teaching methods are often viewed as less effective with Net Generation students. With attention to what Jason Frand called the attributes of the "information-age mindset,"14 GEDI participants discuss ways to use technologies that the Net Generation views as normative (rather than as technology) to challenge these learners to think creatively and critically. As Frand suggested, moving from "interacting on the Net" to "critical thinking" is not necessarily a simple or easy leap. Yet it is a necessary one. Helping students understand that finding information via Google is not synonymous with the critical evaluation of information is one of the tasks of contemporary higher education. As Net Generation students leave college and enter the broader society, "the ability to deal with complex and often ambiguous information will be more important than simply knowing a lot of facts or having an accumulation of knowledge."15

由于忽视正在传授的领域知识,传统教学模式被认为对网络世代学生不再那么有效。注意到贾森·弗伦德所说的“信息时代的心态”特征,研究生教育发展学会参与者讨论如何运用网络世代视为必需品(而不是技术)的技术,来促使这些学习者创造性、批判性的思考。正如弗伦德所说的,从“网上互动”移动到“批判性思维”,并不一定是简单容易的一跃。然而,却是必经之路。帮助学生认识到,通过谷歌找到信息,并不等于对信息的批判性评价。这是当代高等教育的任务之一。随着网络世代学生离开学校进入广阔的社会,“处理复杂而含糊的信息的能力,比简单知道大量事实,掌握大量堆砌的知识,更为重要。”


For some faculty, many of whom have been teaching for several decades, the learning processes of Net Generation students are viewed within a negative framework. Differences in learning processes are perceived as shortcomings—the desire for ubiquitous connectivity, the preference for multitasking and "channel-surfing attention spans," and less tolerance for delays, for example—when compared with previous generations of learners. In GEDI, participants avoid judgmental evaluations of different learning processes and focus instead on creating problem-based, active-learning environments that prepare Net Generation students for the complex 21st-century context in which they live and work.

一些教师,许多人已教了几十年,认为网络世代学生的学习过程只有消极作用。把与上一代学习者相比,学习过程中的差别——比如,渴望无处不在的连接、偏爱多任务工作和“不断变换注意力”、忍受不了缓慢——当作缺点。


GEDI participants, across a wide range of disciplines, are interested in discovering how current technologies might further students' intellectual movement from simplistic "absolute knowers" to more sophisticated "contextual knowers."16 The GEDI seminar conversations also focus on issues of diversity: recognizing diverse curricular goals, diverse learning styles, and the increasingly diverse demographics that exist both inside and outside 21st-century classrooms. GEDI's primary emphasis, though, is on developing curricular approaches and pedagogical practices that facilitate Net Generation learners' abilities to problem solve in complex contexts—a process that requires the contemporary skills, foundational concepts, and intellectual capabilities that go with a FIT mindset.

研究生教育发展学会参与者,来自各个学科,都对揭示当前技术如何将学生的智力活动,从简单的“事实认知者”推进到更复杂的“情景认知者”,很感兴趣。研究生教育发展学会研讨会的讨论也侧重于多样性问题:承认不同的课程目标,不同的学习风格,21世纪教室内外的人口日趋多样化。但是,研究生教育发展学会的重点,是开发课程和教学方式,帮助网络世代学习者有能力解决复杂环境中的问题。这一过程需要与适应性心态相符的当代技能,基本概念和知识能力。


Within the GEDI seminar, participants from fields as diverse as engineering, political science, chemistry, and English examine various problem-based learning case studies. Participants decide how and why a particular case study does (or does not) work and how to improve it. They explore whether the case study involves problem-based learning that encourages students to problem solve while simultaneously using domain knowledge, skill sets, and tools particular to that discipline. Participants assess whether a strategy inadvertently has a closed-ended answer, or whether it provides opportunities for students to suggest alternative solutions. They focus on how Net Gen students' technology skills and learning processes are engaged. In addition, emphasis is placed on case studies requiring students to address complex domestic and/or global contexts in finding possible solutions. These conversations take place with attention to different teaching and learning environments—from small labs and discussion-based classrooms to large lecture halls, hybrid/blended situations, and fully online courses. Following the collective cross-disciplinary discussions about what makes a successful case study, participants work individually or in teams to develop a sample problem-based learning module or case study for use in a course. Part of the task includes providing audience- and site-specific learning objectives for the case study and rationales for how and why various technologies are integrated.

通过研究生教育发展学会研讨会,来自工程、政治、化学、英语等各个学科的参与者,研究各种问题导向式学习的案例研究。参与者决定如何及为何研究(不研究)具体案例,以及如何改进。他们探究某一案例研究是否涉及问题导向式学习,因为这可以鼓励学生同时运用领域知识、技能集、学科特定工具去解决问题。参与者评定某一策略是否无意识的存在封闭式答案,是否为学生暗示有多种解决方案。他们关注网络世代学生用到的技术技能和学习过程。另外,案例研究强调需要学生解决复杂的生活环境问题和全球环境问题,找出可能解决方案。这些讨论注意采用不同的教学和学习环境——从小型实验室和以讨论为基础的课堂到大型演讲厅、在线与现实混合教学,一直到完全在线课程。经过这种共同的跨学科的讨论怎样才是成功的案例研究,参与者独自或组队开发出用于课程中的示例问题导向式学习模型或案例研究。部分任务包括为案例研究提供针对具体观众具体场所的学习目标,以及如何及为何整合各种技术的理由。


In seminar dialogues, participants talk about active learning that recognizes and develops undergraduate students' sense of agency as FIT critical thinkers; they are also fostering their own sense of agency—as future faculty—about their teaching. For example, GEDI facilitators prefer not to overemphasize "how to" prescriptions about various teaching and learning technologies; instead, they encourage graduate students to explore how they might shape the technology to fit their pedagogy rather than vice versa. Likewise, since a critically engaged, self-reflective teaching praxis is what GEDI participants are encouraged to develop, the seminar and assignments are designed to foster a reflective practice. As part of this process, GEDI participants explore the use of Virginia Tech's e-portfolio software as both a teaching tool and a professional development tool. To understand some of the ways they might incorporate the use of an e-portfolio into their teaching and how they might engage Net Generation learners in critical reflection via the tool, they simulate and use the e-portfolio with each other in much the same way that they might ask their own students to use it. GEDI participants also use the e-portfolio to begin the process of building a teaching portfolio. The creation of a teaching philosophy, syllabi, and digital video clips of their teaching can be "housed" in the e-portfolio along with reflections about their teaching and learning praxis.

在研讨会的讨论当中,参与者谈论主动学习,这能承认并发展本科生运用适应技术的批判性思考的感觉。他们也培养他们自己——作为未来的教师——在教学中运用这些的感觉。比如,研究生教育发展学会主持人并不愿意过分强调“如何”规定各种教育学习技术,相反,他们鼓励研究生探索如何将技术应用到教学当中,而不是相反。同样,因为有批判性思维,研究生教育发展学会鼓励参与者多多自我反思教学活动,研讨会和功课都是为了培养反思实践。作为这一过程的一部分,研究生教育发展学会参与者探索弗吉尼亚理工大学电子学习档案软件的用途,既作为教学工具又作为专业发展工具。为了理解这些用途,他们需要把电子学习档案运用到他们的教学当中,以及他们如何吸引网络世代学习者通过这些工具进行批判性反思,他们要求自己的学生怎样使用电子学习档案,他们彼此就模拟学生怎样使用电子学习档案。研究生教育发展学会参与者也使用电子学习档案开始构建教学档案。他们教学当中创建的教学理念、教学大纲、数码视频片段,都可以存放在电子档案中,同时还有他们对教学和学习过程的反思。


It is important that we develop teaching and learning practices that encourage the Net Generation to develop critically engaged lifelong learning skills—with the emphasis on critically engaged. Technology should not be used to allow students to become passive recipients of information, as some traditional teaching methods do. Integrative approaches to teaching, learning, and technology should not render our students passive learners, however unintentional. Tony Bates has argued that students should be provided opportunities to interact with their instructors and with other learners, whether minutes, miles, or continents apart and, most important, that Net Generation learners "need to be able to challenge and question what they are being taught."17 Higher education needs to foster active learners with the complex critical thinking and problem-solving skills required for this new century. At Virginia Tech, the GEDI project engages future faculty—those who will be responsible for teaching the Net Generation—in developing "best practices" in technology-enriched teaching and learning.

重要的是,我们发展教学和学习实践,鼓励网络世代批判性的运用终身学习技能——强调批判性的使用。技术不应该被用来让学生变成信息的被动接受者,就像某些传统教学模式所做的那样。把教学、学习和技术综合起来,不应该把我们的学生变成被动学习者,无论有意无意。托尼·贝茨宣称应该为学生提供机会与其教育者及其他学习者互动,不要考虑时间空间的限制,最重要的是,网络世代学习者“需要能够挑战并质疑他们所学的东西”——高等教育需要培养的主动学习者,具有新世纪所必需的复杂批判性思考和问题解决技能。在弗吉尼亚理工大学,研究生教育发展学会项目吸引未来的教师——那些即将教导网络世代的人——发展技术丰富的教育学习的“最佳实践方式”。


Conclusion

结论


Current and future faculty are expanding their understanding of the Net Generation, technology, and pedagogy in an effort to improve teaching and learning. For this to occur, Baby Boomer and Gen-X faculty, as well as graduate students, need systematic support to develop and maintain their own fluency in information technology—to be FIT. Net Generation students assume a technology-enabled context in much of their lives and work; they exhibit a degree of digital literacy not necessarily shared by faculty; and they too need the full complement of knowledge and skills to be FIT. A first step is to focus on what students should know and be able to do. A next step is to understand what technology means to students. Programs such as FDI and GEDI illustrate how to support faculty in their efforts to engage the Net Generation.

当前和未来的教师正在扩展他们对网络世代、技术和教学法的理解,并致力于改善教学和学习。要做到这一点,婴儿潮一代和里根世代教师,以及研究生,需要得到系统的支持,发展和坚持他们自己能够流畅使用信息技术——即适应技术。网络世代学生在学习环境中所使用的技术和他们生活及工作中一样多,他们展示出的数字换素养的程度并不一定与教师分享,他们也需要为了适应技术而补足知识和技能。第一步就是关注学生应该知道什么以及能够做什么。接下来就是理解技术对于学生意味着社么。教师发展学会和研究生发展学会等项目表明如何支持教师努力融入网络世代。


Endnotes

尾注




  1. Robert B. Kvavik, Judith B. Caruso, and Glenda Morgan, ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2004: Convenience, Connection, and Control (Boulder, Colo.: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, research study, vol. 5, 2004), http://www.educause.edu/ers0405/.


  2. I. Elaine Allen and Jeff Seaman, Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2002 and 2003 (Needham, Mass.: Sloan-C, September 2003), http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/sizing_opportunity.pdf.


  3. Browse the Web sites at the Center for Academic Transformation http://www.center.rpi.edu, the Sloan Consortium http://www.sloan-c.org, WCET http://www.wcet.info, and the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR) http://www.educause.edu/ecar/ for numerous resources, from case studies to program analyses of pilot initiatives and emerging practices.


  4. Jason Frand, "The Information-Age Mindset: Changes in Students and Implications for Higher Education," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 35, no. 5 (September/October 2000), pp. 15–24, http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm00/articles005/erm0051.pdf.


  5. Sherry Turkle, "How Computers Change the Way We Think," Chronicle Review, vol. 50, no. 21 (January 30, 2004), p. B26, available by subscription at http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i21/21b02601.htm.


  6. Sherry Turkle, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet (New York: Touchstone, 1995).


  7. (a) Brock Read, "Back-to-School Blogging: Web Logs Help Students Prepare for Campus Life," Chronicle of Higher Education, September 3, 2004; available by subscription at http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v51/i02/02a03501.htm. For more information about educational blogging and student behavior, see also
    (b) Stephen Downes, "Educational Blogging," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 5 (September/October 2004), pp. 14–26, http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm04/erm0450.asp.


  8. (a) National Research Council, Being Fluent with Information Technology (Washington, D.C.: National Academies, 1999), http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6482.html;
    (b) browse further at the host site http://www.nap.edu/ for numerous other resources on related topics.


  9. Browse Virginia Tech's Faculty Development Institute Web site http://www.fdi.vt.edu/summer/2004/TrackC.html for more information about faculty training programs.


  10. Browse Virginia Tech's Educational Technology Web site http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/id/index.html for more information on instructional design and other teaching resources.


  11. See (a) Element K http://www.elementk.com and
    (b) Atomic Learning http://www.atomiclearning.com.


  12. Donald Z. Spicer, Peter B. DeBlois, and the EDUCAUSE Current Issues Committee, "Current IT Issues: 2004," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 3 (May/June 2004), pp. 12–26, http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm04/erm0430.asp.


  13. See (a) Carole A. Barone, "The Changing Landscape and the New Academy," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 38, no. 5 (September/October 2003), pp. 40–47, http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0353.pdf; and
    (b) Susan Walsh Veronikas and Michael F. Shaughnessy, "Teaching and Learning in a Hybrid World: An Interview with Carol Twigg," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 4 (July/August 2004), pp. 50–62, http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm04/erm0443.asp.


  14. Frand, op. cit. 引用如前


  15. Ibid. 同上


  16. Marcia B. Baxter Magolda, Making Their Own Way: Narratives for Transforming Higher Education to Promote Self-Development (Sterling, Va.: Stylus Pub, 2001), pp. 27–36.


  17. Tony Bates, "Teaching, Learning, and the Impact of Multimedia Technologies," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 35, no. 5 (September/October 2000), pp.38–43, http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm00/articles005/erm0053.pdf.


About the Authors

作者简介


Anne H. Moore is associate vice president for learning technologies at Virginia Tech, where she coordinates such programs as the Faculty Development Institute and the Graduate Education Development Institute. In addition to teaching in urban affairs and planning, she assists underserved rural and urban communities with integrating technology in learning activities. Moore is founding chair of the Electronic Campus of Virginia. She has served as staff director for two reports on the future of Virginia higher education and sits on several advisory boards. Moore holds three degrees from the College of William and Mary and has authored numerous articles, book chapters, and policy papers.

安妮·摩尔,弗吉尼亚理工大学学习技术部副部长助理,他负责协调教师发展学会和研究生教育发展学会这些项目。另外也教授《城市事务与规划》,他帮助服务水平低下的农村和城市社区,将技术整合进学习活动。摩尔是弗吉尼亚电子校园协会的首任会长。他曾担任两份关于弗吉尼亚高等教育未来的报告的人事主任,参加过数个咨询委员会。摩尔拥有威廉与玛丽学院的三项学位,撰写若干文章、书籍章节、政策论文。


John F. Moore is director of educational technologies at Virginia Tech's Faculty Development Institute, recognized for its best practices in a national benchmarking study sponsored by the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. Moore leads initiatives in e-portfolios, online learning systems, and faculty development. He also heads Virginia Tech's planning and implementation of e-portfolios. Moore codirected the Sloan Foundation–funded ACCESS project to study the effects of asynchronous learning courses on students and faculty, as well as several National Cancer Institute–funded consumer health intervention projects using interactive kiosks. Moore holds bachelor's and master's degrees from Ohio University and a doctorate in instructional systems from Virginia Tech.

约翰·摩尔,弗吉尼亚理工大学教师发展学会学习技术部主任,该学会是国家高等教育行政人员联合会主办的国家基准研究当中公认的最佳实践。摩尔引领电子学习档案、在线学习系统和教师发展的创新。摩尔与他人共同负责斯隆基金会资助的ACCESS 项目,研究教师和学生在异步学习课程中的学习效果,以及国家癌症研究所资助的利用交互式信息亭的一些消费者健康干预项目。摩尔拥有俄亥俄州大学的学士学位和硕士学位,并在从弗吉尼亚理工大学获得教学系统博士学位。


Shelli B. Fowler is director of the Graduate Education Development Institute in Learning Technologies at Virginia Tech and associate professor of English. Her research areas include critical pedagogy and the integration of teaching and technologies, and she is the coeditor of Included in English Studies: Learning Climates That Cultivate Racial and Ethnic Diversity. She is the recipient of several department, college, and university teaching awards. Fowler earned her doctorate from The University of Texas at Austin.

谢丽·福勒,弗吉尼亚理工大学研究生教育发展学会会长,英语系副教授。其研究领域包括批判教学法、教学与技术的整合,也是《英语研究:培养种族及民族多样性的学习风气》编者之一。获得过部门、学院和大学的数项教学奖励。福勒在德州大学奥斯汀分校获得博士学位。


http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/FacultyDevelopmentfortheNetGen/6071